The current study examines the effects of centralization on the relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction using referent cognitions theory as a theoretical foundation. The sample consists of 489 members of the National Association of Purchasing Managers. Results indicate that the relationships between procedural, distributive, and interactional justice and job satisfaction are stronger under conditions of high centralization. Directions for future research and implications for managers are discussed.
Alexander, J.A. (1991). Adaptive change in corporate control processes . Academy of Management Journal, 34, 162-193.
3.
Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin , 103, 411-423.
4.
Aquino, K., Griffith, R.W., Allen, D.G., & Hom, P.W. (1997). Integrating justice constructs into the turnover process: A test of a referent cognitions model. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1208-1227.
5.
Armstrong, J.S., & Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396-402.
Bhargava, S., & Kelkar, A. (2000). Prediction of job involvement, job satisfaction, and empowerment from organizational structure and corporate culture. Psychological Studies, 45, 43-50.
8.
Brayfield, A.H., & Roth, H.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
9.
Chang, M.H., & Harrington, J.E. , Jr. (2000). Centralization vs. decentralization in a multi-unit organization: A computational model of a retail chain as a multi-agent adaptive system. Management Science, 46, 1427-1440.
10.
Childs, J. (1973). Strategies of control and organizational behavior . Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 1-17.
11.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
12.
Cronbach, L.J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414-417.
Espino-Rodriguez, T.F., & Taylor, J.S. (2006). The perceived influence of centralizing operations in chain hotels. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 6(4), 251-266.
15.
Fayol, H. (1916). General and industrial management. London: Pitman.
16.
Ferrell, O.C., & Skinner, S.J. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Marketing Research , 25, 103-109.
17.
Fleurke, F., & Hulst, R. (2006). A contingency approach to decentralization. Public Organization Review, 6, 37-56.
18.
Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Biefhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
19.
Fornell, C., & Larker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 28, 39-50.
20.
Goldman, B.M. (2003). The application of referent cognitions theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: The role of organizational justice and anger. Journal of Management, 29, 705-728.
21.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
24.
Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
McFarlin, D.B., & Sweeney, P.D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
27.
McGregor, D.M. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Niehoff, B.P., & Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-557.
29.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-904.
30.
Poitevin, M. (2000). Can the theory of incentives explain decentralization ? Canadian Journal of Economics, 33(4), 878-906.
31.
Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis . Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
32.
Richardson, H.A., Vandenberg, R.J., Blum, T.C., & Roman, P.M. (2002). Does decentralization make a difference for the organization? An examination of the boundary conditions circumscribing decentralized decision-making and organizational financial performance. Journal of Management, 28, 217-244.
33.
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M.L., & Cropanzano, R.S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 294-304.
34.
Segars, A. (1996). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research . Omega, 25, 107-121.
35.
Sethi, R. (2000). New product quality and product development teams . Journal of Marketing, 64, 1-14.
36.
Sharma, S., Durand, R.M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables . Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 291-300.
37.
Sheppard, B.H., Lewicki, R.J., & Minton, J.W. (1993). Organizational justice: The search for fairness in the workplace. New York: Lexington Books.
38.
Siegel, P.A., Post, C., Brockner, J., Fishman, A.Y., & Garden, C. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment . Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 13-24.
39.
Yi, Y. (1989). On the evaluation of main effects in multiplicative regression models. Journal of the Market Research Society , 31, 133-138.
