There is little research examining variability in leadership outcomes over time as a function of individual differences. The present study investigates how the extent to which individuals are perceived as leaders varies over time, with self-monitoring and authentic leadership as predictors. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses found that change in the extent to which individuals were perceived to be leaders by others varied across individuals, but this variability was not due to individuals' self-monitoring, authentic leadership, or declining interrater reliability. It was also found that individuals' overestimation of themselves as leaders increased over time. Finally, an initial measure of authentic leadership was developed.
Alimo-Metcalfe, B. (1998). 360 degree feedback and leadership development . International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(1), 35-44.
2.
Ashford, S.J. (1989). Self-assessments in organizations: A literature review and integrative model. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 133-174). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
Atwater, L.E., Dionne, S.D., Avolio, B., Camobreco, J.F., & Lau, A.W. (1999). A longitudinal study of the leadership development process: Individual differences predicting leader effectiveness. Human Relations, 52, 1543-1562.
4.
Atwater, L.E., & Yammarino, F.J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
5.
Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W.L., Walumbwa, F.O., Luthans, F., & May, D.R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
6.
Avolio, B.J., Sosik, J.J., Jung, D.I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Leadership models, methods, and applications. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 277-307). Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley.
7.
Baril, G.L., Ayman, R., & Palmiter, D.J. (1994). Measuring leader behavior: Moderators of discrepant self and subordinate descriptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 82-94.
8.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1990). The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9.
Bass, B.M., & Yammarino, F.J. (1991). Congruence of self and others' leadership ratings of naval officers for understanding successful performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 40(4), 437-454.
Bliese, P.D., & Ployhart, R.E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 362-387.
12.
Bradley, J.P., Nicol, A.A.M., Charbonneau, D., & Meyer, J.P. (2002). Personality correlates of leadership development in Canadian forces officer candidates. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34(2), 92-103.
13.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
Carless, S.A., & Roberts-Thompson, G.P. (2001). Self-ratings in training programs: An examination of level of performance and the effects of feedback . International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(3), 217-225.
15.
Chemers, M.M., Watson, C.B., & May, S.T. (2000). Dispositional affect and leadership effectiveness: A comparison of self-esteem, optimism, and efficacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 267-277.
16.
Conway, J.M., & Huffcutt, A.I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168.
17.
Cronshaw, S.F., & Lord, R.G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on leadership perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology , 72(1), 97-106.
18.
Day, D.V., Schleicher, D.J., Unckless, A.L., & Hiller, N.J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology , 87(2), 390-401.
19.
Day, D.V., Sin, H.P., & Chen, T.T. (2004). Assessing the burdens of leadership: Effects of formal leadership roles on individual performance over time. Personnel Psychology, 57(3), 573-605.
20.
De Hoogh, A.H.B., Den Hartog, D.N., & Koopman, P.L. (2005). Linking the Big Five factors of personality to charismatic and transactional leadership: Perceived dynamic work environment as a moderator. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 839-865.
21.
Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628.
22.
Eagley, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Makhijani, M.G. (1995). Gender and effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125-145.
23.
Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D. (2003). How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 5-17.
24.
Ensley, M.D., Hmieleski, K.M., & Pearce, C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 217-231.
25.
Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659-676.
26.
Gangestad, S.W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530-555.
27.
Gardner, W.L., & Schermerhorn, J.R., Jr. (2004). Performance gains through positive organizational behavior and authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 33(3), 270-281.
28.
George, B. (2003). Leadership is authenticity, not style. In Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value (pp. 18-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
29.
Hackman, J.R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(2), 162-187.
30.
Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Harris, H.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology , 41(1), 43-62.
32.
Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
33.
Huber, G.P., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1995). Introduction. In G. P. Huber & A. H. Van de Ven (Eds.), Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes of organizational change (pp. vii-xiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69, 85-98.
35.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
36.
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780.
37.
Keller, R.T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202-210.
38.
Kelly, J.R., & McGrath, J.E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 395-407.
39.
Kenny, D.A., & Zaccaro, S.J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership . Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 678-685.
40.
Kilduff, M., & Day, D.V. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1047-1060.
41.
Lim, B., & Ployhart, R.E. (2004). Transformational leadership: Relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 610-621.
42.
Lord, R.G., DeVader, C.L., & Alliger, G.M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures . Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 402-410.
43.
Lord, R.G., & Emrich, C.G. (2001). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551-579.
44.
Lord, R.G., & Maher, K.J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston: Routledge.
45.
May, D.R., Chan, A.Y.L., Hodges, T.D., & Avolio, B.J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership . Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 247-260.
McGrath, J.E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(1), 7-27.
48.
Ostroff, C., Atwater, L.E., & Feinberg, B.J. (2004). Understanding self-other agreement: A look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes . Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 333-375.
49.
Ployhart, R.E., & Hakel, M.D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Predicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859-901.
50.
Ployhart, R.E., Holtz, B.C., & Bliese, P.D. (2002). Longitudinal data analysis applications of random coefficient modeling to leadership research. Leadership Quarterly , 13(4), 455-486.
51.
Ployhart, R.E., Lim, B., & Chan, K. (2001). Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 809-842.
52.
Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13(1), 18-35.
53.
Smither, J.W., London, M., & Richmond, K.R. (2005). The relationship between leaders' personality and their reactions to and use of multisource feedback: A longitudinal study. Group & Organization Management , 30(2), 181-210.
54.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 526-537.
55.
Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51(1), 125-139.
56.
Snyder, M., & Simpson, J.A. (1984). Self-monitoring and dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1281-1291.
57.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
58.
Straus, S.G. (1999). Testing a typology of tasks: An empirical validation of McGrath's (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Research , 30(2), 166-187.
59.
Weed, S.E., Mitchell, T.R., & Moffitt, W. (1976). Leadership style, subordinate personality, and task type as predictors of performance and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 58-66.
60.
Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, A., & Werner, J.M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530.
61.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62.
Zaccaro, S.J., Foti, R.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 308-315.
