The increased thickness of the carotid artery is associated with the development of coronary and cerebrovascular events. In this study our purpose was to evaluate the carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) by using multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) and the intima media thickness (IMT) by using semiautomated ultrasonography (SA-US) to evaluate the agreement between the two methods.
Methods
This is a retrospective study, and the institutional review board approval was obtained. Twenty-one patients (age range, 59–81 years) were analyzed with the use of a 16-detector row CT and a sonographic scanner. In total, 14 subjects had shown cerebral ischemic symptoms. The IMT was quantified by the use of specific semiautomated software (ImgTracer™, Global Biomedical Technologies, Roseville, CA) by four expert observers, and the CAWT was measured by use of the MDCTA. Data were compared with the Wilcoxon test for paired samples. Bland–Altman statistics was used to measure the agreement between MDCTA and SA-US. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Forty-two carotids were analyzed, and the CAWT ranged from 0.64 to 2.99 mm, with a mean value of 1.438 mm. By analyzing the Bland–Altman plots, we observed a good agreement between SA-US and correlation coefficient r were 0.9250 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.864–0.959; p < 0.0001), 0.9265 (95% CI 0.866–0.961; p < 0.0001), 0.9466 (95% CI 0.902–0.971; p < 0.0001), and 0.8621 (95% CI: 0.756–0.924; p < 0.0001) for observer 1, observer 2, observer 3 and observer 4 respectively.
Conclusions
Data of this preliminary study by using SA-US and MDCTA demonstrated a good agreement between in the measurement of CAWT and IMT.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GorelickP.B.Stroke prevention therapy beyond antithrombotics: Unifying mechanisms in ischemic stroke pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Stroke2002; 33: 862–875.
2.
SaccoR.L., AdamsR.Albers. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke2006; 37: 577–617.
3.
LibbyP.Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature2002; 420: 868–874.
4.
CelermajerD.S., SorensenK.E., GoochV.M.Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet1992; 340: 1111–1115.
5.
SchoenhagenP., ZiadaK.M., VinceD.G.Arterial remodeling and coronary artery disease: the concept of “dilated” versus “obstructive” coronary atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 38: 297–306.
6.
De GrootE.Measurement of carotid intima-media thickness to assess progression and regression of atherosclerosis. Nature280–288.
7.
KitamuraA., IsoH., ImanoH.Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque characteristics as a risk factor for stroke in Japanese elderly men.2004; 35: 2788–2794.
8.
Iglesias del SolA., BotsM.L., GrobbeeD.E., HofmanA., WittemanJ.C.Carotid intima-media thickness at different sites: Relation to incident myocardial infarction; The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J2002; 23: 934–940.
9.
Bonithon-KoppC., TouboulP.J., BerrC.Relation of intima-media thickness to atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries: The EVA study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol1996; 16: 310–316.
10.
SalonenJ.T., SalonenR.Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morbidity and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb1991; 11: 1245–1249.
11.
EbrahimS., PapacostaO., WhincupP.Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke1999; 30: 841–850.
12.
LiR., DuncanB.B., MetcalfP.A.for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. B-mode-detected carotid artery plaque in a general population. Stroke1994; 25: 2377–2383.
13.
SabaL., SanfilippoR., PirisiR., PascalisL., MontisciR., MallariniG.Multidetector row CT in the study of atherosclerotic carotid artery. Neuroradiology2007; 49: 623–637.
14.
SabaL., CaddeoG., SanfilippoR., MontisciR., MallariniG.Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque by using multidetector-row CT angiography: Comparison with surgical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2007; 28: 716–723.
SabaL., CaddeoG., SanfilippoR., MontisciR., MallariniG.CT and US in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: advantages of multidetector-row CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2007; 28: 1061–1066.
17.
RobinsonM.L., SacksD., PerlmutterG.S., MarinelliD.L.Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1988; 155: 1045–1049.
18.
WendelhagI., GustavssonT., SuurkulaM., BerglundG., WikstrandJ.Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: Fundamental principles and description of a computerized analysing system. Clin Physiol1991; 11: 565–577.
19.
SabaL., MallariniG.MDCTA of carotid plaque degree of stenosis: Evaluation of interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 190: W41–W46.
20.
SabaL., MallarinG.Window settings for the study of calcified carotid plaques with multidetector CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2009; 30: 1445–1450.
21.
EbrahimS., PapacostaO., WhincupP.Carotid plaque, intima media thickness, cardiovascular risk factors, and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: The British Regional Heart Study. Stroke1999; 30: 841–850.
22.
WendelhagI., GustavssonT., SuurkulaM.Ultrasound measurement of wall thickness in the carotid artery: Fundamental principles and description of a computerized analysing system. Clin Physiol1991; 11: 565–577.
23.
WendelhagI., LiangQ., GustavssonT., WikstrandJ.A new automated computerizing analyzing system simplifies readings and reduces the varaibility in ultrasound measurement of intima-media-thickness. Stroke1997; 28: 2195–2200.
24.
WendelhagI., WiklundO., WikstrandJ.Arterial wall thickness in familial hypercholesterolemia. Ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb1992; 12: 70–77.
25.
TouboulP.J., PratiP., ScarabinP.Y.Use of monitoring software to improve the measurement of carotid wall thickness by B-mode imaging. J Hypertens Suppl1992; 10: S37–S41.
van der MeerI.M., BotsM.L., HofmanA.Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: The Rotterdam Study. Circulation2004; 109: 1089–1094.
SabaL., SanfilippoR., MontisciR., MallariniG.Carotid artery wall thickness: comparison between sonography and multidetector row CT angiography. Neuroradiology2010; 52: 75–82.
30.
SabaL., SanfilippoR., MontisciR., MallariniG.Associations between carotid artery wall thickness and cardiovascular risk factors using multidetector CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2010; 31: 1758–1763.
31.
JoakimsenO., BonaaK.H., Stensland-BuggeE.Reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness and morphology; the Tromso Study. Stroke1997; 28: 2201–2207.
32.
SuriJ.S., HaralickR.M., SheehanF.H.Greedy algorithm for error correction in automatically produced boundaries from low contrast ventriculgrams. Pattern Anal Appl2000; 3: 39–60.
33.
MolinariF., ZengG., SuriJ.S.Greedy technique and its validation for fusion of two segmentation paradigms leads to an accurate intima–media thickness measure in plaque carotid arterial ultrasound. J Vasc Ultrasound2010; 34: 63–73.
34.
MolinariF., ZengG., SuriJ.S.A state of the art review on intima–media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound. Comput Methods Programs Biomed2010; 100: 201–221.
35.
MolinariF., MeiburgerK.M., ZengG., NicolaidesA., SuriJ.S.CAUDLES-EF: Carotid automated ultrasound double line extraction system using edge flow. J Digit Imaging2011; (ACCEPTED).
36.
MolinariF., LiboniW., PantziarisM., SuriJ.S.“Calsfoam - completed automated local statistics based first order absolute moment” for carotid wall recognition, segmentation and IMT measurement: Validation and bench-marking on a 300 patient database. Int Angiol2011; 30: 227–241.
