Decision Support at the Point of Care: Challenges in Knowledge Representation,Management,and Patient-specific Access

Abstract

Many applications in a clinical information system can benefit from the incorporation of medical knowledge to provide patient-specific, point-of-care decision support. These include computer-based provider order entry, referral, clinical result interpretation, consultation, adverse event monitoring, scheduling, shared patient-doctor decision-making, and generation of alerts and reminders, among others. To be executable, knowledge must be represented in the form of rules, constraints, calculations, guidelines, and other logical/algorithmic formats. The main difficulty is that the integration of such knowledge into clinical applications, when it occurs, tends to be very system- and application-specific, often encoded in a programming language, or even in the formating specifications of a user interaction display. Also, the data references and services invoked are highly dependent on the system/platform and electronic medical record implementation. This makes it difficult and time-consuming to encode authoritative evidence-based knowledge, severely limits the ability to disseminate and share successes, and hampers efforts to review and update the logic as medical knowledge changes. Solutions to this problem involve the development of standards-based representations for medical knowledge, and tools for authoring/editing, dissemination, adaptation to local environments, and execution. Numerous approaches are being pursued, all of which will be described in this presentation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, et al. (1998). Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. J Am Med Assoc 280:1311–1316.

California State Senate Bill 1875 (2000). http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/99-00/bill/sen/sb_1851-1900/sb_1875_bill_20000928_ chaptered.html. Last accessed March 2004.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002). The National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS); (http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/). Last accessed March 2004.

Greenes RA, Peleg M, Boxwala A, Tu S, Patel V, Shortliffe EH (2001). Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects. Medinfo 10(Pt 1):201–205.

Health Level Seven (http://www.h17.org/). Last accessed March 2004.

Johnson PD, Tu SW, Musen MA, Purves I (2001). A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support. In: Proceedings, AMIA Symp. Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association, pp. 294–298.

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors (1999). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kuperman GJ, Hiltz FL, Teich JM (1997). Advanced alerting features: displaying new relevant data and retracting alerts. In: Proceedings, AMIA Annu Fall Symp. Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association, pp. 243–247.

The Leapfrog Group (http://www.leapfroggroup.org/). Last accessed March 2004.

10.

National Guideline Clearinghouse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (http://www.guidelines.gov/). Last accessed March 2004.

11.

NCVHS (2001). Information for health: a strategy for building the national health information infrastructure. Final report (http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/nhiilayo.pdf/). Last accessed March 2004.

12.

Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Boxwala A (2002). BNF and built-in classes for object-oriented guideline expression language (GELLO). Decision Systems Group Technical Report DSG02-01 (http://dsg.bwh.harvard.edu/gello/GELLClassesBNF.rtf/).

13.

Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy SN, Jain NL, Tu SW, Oliver DE, et al. (1998). The GuideLine Interchange Format: a model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5:357–372.

14.

Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu S, Lacson R, et al. (2000). GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. In: Proceedings, AMIA Symp. Bethesda, MD: American Medical InformaticsAssociation, pp. 645–649.

15.

Richardson WC, editor (1999). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

16.

Schadow G, Russler DC, Mead CN, McDonald CJ (2000). Integrating medical information and knowledge in the HL7 RIM. In: Proceedings, AMIA Symp. Bethesda, MD: American Medical InformaticsAssociation, pp. 764–768.

17.

Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ (1999). Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6:104–114.

18.

Teich JM, Glaser JP, Beckley RF, Aranow M, Bates DW, Kuperman GW, et al. (1999). The Brigham integrated computing system (BICS): advanced clnical systems in an academic hospital environment. Int J Med Inf 54:197–208.