AmbersonJBJr, McMahonBT, PinnerM (1931). A clinical trial of sanocrysin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Tuberc24: 401–435.
2.
BeachamBE, KurganskyD, GouldWM (1990). Circumoral dermatitis caused by tartar control dentifrices. J Am Acad Dermatol22: 1029–1032.
3.
BeggC, ChoM, EastwoodS, HortonR, MoherD, OlkinI (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc276: 637–639.
4.
BellRM, KleinSP (1984). Management and evaluation of the effects of misclassification in a controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res63(Spec Iss):731–734.
5.
BlackwelderWC (1982). ‘Proving the null hypothesis’ in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials3: 345–353.
6.
BlackwelderWC (2001). Equivalence trials. In: Biostatistics in clinical trials.RedmondCK, ColtonT, editors. New York: Wiley, pp. 179–185.
7.
BlackwelderWC, ChangMA (1984). Sample size graphs for ‘proving the null hypothesis’. Controlled Clin Trials5: 97–105.
8.
BrittainE, WittesJ (1989). Factorial designs in clinical trials: the effectiveness of non-compliance and subadditivity. Stat Med8: 161–171.
9.
BrownBW (1980). The crossover experiment for clinical trials. Biometrics36: 69–80.
10.
BuckC, DonnerA (1982). The design of controlled experiments in the evaluation of non-therapeutic interventions. J Chron Dis35: 531–538.
11.
BullJP (1959). The historical development of clinical therapeutic trials. J Chron Dis10: 218–248.
12.
CaplanDJ, SladeGD, BiesbrockAR, BartizekRD, McClanahanSF, BeckJD (1999). A comparison of increment and incidence density analyses in evaluating the anticaries effects of two dentrifices. Caries Res33: 16–22.
13.
CAPS Investigators (1994). The cardiac arrhythmia pilot study. Am J Cardiol57: 91–95.
14.
CarriereKC (1994). Crossover designs for clinical trials. Stat Med13: 1063–1069.
15.
ChalmersTC (1993). Meta-analytic stimulus for changes in clinical trials. Stat Methods Med Res2: 161–172.
ChiltonNW, FertigJW (1958). Clinical dental trial. I. A new caries-inhibitory agent. J Dent Res37: 335–350.
18.
ChowSC, LiuJ (1992). Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies.New York: Marcel Dekker.
19.
CIOMS/WHO (1993). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.Geneva: CIOMS.
20.
ClarkDC, MechanicM, BantingDW (1982). A further look at the role of radiographs in trials of caries-prophylactic agents. J Pub Health Dent42: 237–250.
21.
ClarkDC, HanleyJA, WeinsteinPL, StammJW (1985). An empirically based system to estimate the effectiveness of caries preventive agents. Caries Res19: 83–95.
22.
CohenJ (1994). Clinical trial monitoring: hit or miss?Science264: 1534–1537.
23.
CornfieldJ (1978). Randomization by group: a formal analysis. Am J Epidemiol108: 100–102.
24.
Council on Dental Therapeutics (1988). Report of workshop aimed at defining guidelines for caries clinical trials: superiority and equivalency claims for anticaries dentifrices. J Am Dent Assoc117: 663–665.
25.
D'AgostinoRB, MassaroJM (2004). New developments in medical clinical trials. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C18–C24.
26.
DanielsM, HillAB (1952). Chemotherapy of pulmonary tuberculosis in young adults: an analysis of the combined results of three medical research council trials. Br Med J1: 1162–1168.
27.
DeLattreVF (1999). Factors contributing to adverse soft tissue reactions due to the use of tartar control toothpastes: report of a case and literature review. J Periodontol70: 803–807.
28.
DerSimonianR, LairdN (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials7: 177–188.
29.
DonnerA, BirkettN, BuckC (1981). Randomization by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiol114: 906–914.
30.
DownerMC, WorthingtonHV (1992). The status of bite-wing radiographs in enhancing discriminatory ability in prophylactic clinical trials. Caries Res26: 195–200.
31.
EggerM, JuniP, BartlettC (2001). Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc285: 1996–1999.
32.
EnasGG, DornseifBE, SampsonCB, RockholdFW, WuuJ (1989). Monitoring versus interim analysis of clinical trials: a perspective from the pharmaceutical industry. Cont Clin Trials10: 57–70.
FirestoneAR, SemaD, HeavenTJ, WeemsRA (1998). The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images. Caries Res32: 127–134.
35.
FisherRA (1925). Statistical methods for research workers.Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
36.
FisherRA (1926). The arrangement of field experiments. J Min Agric G Br33: 503–513.
37.
FleissJL (1982). Multicentre clinical trials: Bradford Hill's contributions and some subsequent developments. Stat Med1: 353–359.
38.
FleissJ (1984). Assessing treatment effects in caries trials using ordered categorical data. J Dent Res63(Spec Iss):778–782.
39.
FleissJ (1986). Analysis of data from multiclinic trials. Control Clin Trials7: 267–275.
40.
FleissJL, FischmanSL, ChiltonNW, ParkMH (1979). Reliability of discrete measurements in caries trials. Caries Res13: 23–31.
41.
FreedmanB (1987). Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med317: 141–145.
GearyDN, HuntingtonE, GilbertRJ (1992). Analysis of multivariate data from four dental clinical trials. J R Statist Soc A155: 77–89.
44.
GillumRF, WilliamsPT, SondikeE (1980). Some considerations for the planning of the total community prevention trials—when is sample size adequate?J Community Health5: 270–278.
45.
GouldL (1998). Multi-centre trial analysis revisited. Stat Med17: 1779–1797.
46.
GraingerDJ, LehnoffRW, BollmerBW, ZacherlWA (1984). Analysis of covariance in dental caries clinical trials. J Dent Res63(Spec Iss):766–771.
47.
HanniganA, O'MullaneDM, BarryD, SchaferR, RobertsAJ (2001). A re-analysis of a caries clinical trial by survival analysis. J Dent Res80: 427–431.
48.
HanniganA (2004). Using survival methodologies in demonstrating caries efficacy. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C99–C102.
49.
HeifetzSB (1983). Ethical considerations and study design. Proceedings of the Conference on Caries Clinical Trials.Chicago, IL: American Dental Association.
50.
HillAB (1952). The clinical trial. N Engl J Med247: 113–119.
51.
HujoelPP, IsokangasPJ, TieksoJ, DavisS, LamontRJ, DeRouenTA (1994). A re-analysis of caries rates in a preventive trial using Poisson regression models. J Dent Res73: 573–579.
52.
HuntRJ (1986). Percent agreement, Pearson's correlation, and kappa as measures of inter-examiner reliability. J Dent Res65: 128–130.
53.
ImreyPB, KingmanA (2004). Analysis of clinical trials involving noncavitated caries lesions. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C103–C108.
JamesKE, ForrestWHJr, RoseRL (1985). Crossover and noncrossover designs in four-point parallel line analgesic assays. Clin Pharmacol Ther37: 242–252.
56.
JohnsonMF (1993). Comparative efficacy of NaF and SMFP dentifrices in caries prevention: a meta-analytic overview. Caries Res27: 328–336.
57.
JohnsonMF (2004). The role of risk factors in the identification of appropriate subjects for caries clinical trials: validity and efficiency considerations. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C116–C118.
58.
JonesB, JarvisP, LewisJA, EbbuttAF (1996). Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods. Br Med J313: 36–39.
59.
KatzBP, HuntingtonE (2004). Statistical issues for combining multiple caries diagnostics for demonstrating caries efficacy. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C):C109–C112.
60.
KingmanA (1977). Adequate cohort sizes for caries clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol6: 30–35.
61.
KingmanA (1978). A method of utilizing the subjects’ initial caries experience to increase efficiency in caries clinical trials. Biometry Section, National Caries Program.Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Dental Research.
KingmanA (1992). Specific statistical considerations relevant to the design and analysis of gingivitis trials demonstrating product superiority or equivalence. J Periodontal Res27: 378–389.
64.
KleinH, PalmerCE, KnutsonJW (1938). Studies on dental caries, dental status and dental needs of elementary school children. Pub Health Reports53: 751–765.
65.
KleinSP, BellRM, BohannanHM, DisneyJA, WilsonA (1984). The reliability of clinical and radiographic examinations in the national preventive dentistry demonstration program.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
66.
KochGG, AmaraIA, BrownBWJr, ColtonT, GillingsDB (1989). A two-period crossover design for the comparison of two active treatments and placebo. Stat Med8: 487–504.
67.
KowitzG, JacobsenJ, MengZ, LucatortoF (1990). The effects of tartar-control toothpaste on the oral soft tissues. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol70: 529–536.
68.
LachinJM (1981). Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials2: 93–113.
69.
LeskeGS, RipaLW (1980). Ethical and legal considerations associated with clinical field trials. J Dent Res59(Spec Iss C): 1243–1253.
70.
LevineRJ (1986). Ethics and regulation of clinical research.2nd ed.Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
71.
LevineRJ, DennisonDK (1997). Randomized clinical trials in periodontology: ethical considerations. Ann Periodontol2: 83–94.
72.
LouisTA, LavoriPW, BailarJCIII, PolanskyM (1984). Crossover and self-controlled designs in clinical research. N Engl J Med310: 24–31.
73.
MakuchR, SimonR (1978). Sample size requirements for evaluating a conservative therapy. Cancer Treatment Reports (62)7: 1037–1040.
74.
ManclLA, HujoelPP, DeRouenTA (2004). Efficiency issues among statistical methods for demonstrating efficacy of caries prevention. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C95–C98.
75.
MarksRG (2004). The future of web-based clinical research in dentistry. J Dent Res83(Spec Iss C): C25–C28.
76.
McClendonBJ, DriscollWS, AbramsAM, BarbanoJP (1972). A procedure for estimating sample size in clinical trials of dental caries preventives. J Dent Res51: 1589–1593.
77.
Medical Research Council (1948). Streptomycin treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Br Med J2: 769–782.
MeinertCL (1986). Clinical trials: design, conduct and analysis.New York: Oxford.
80.
MeinertCL (1998). Beyond CONSORT: need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. J Am Med Assoc278: 1487–1489.
81.
MoherD, SchulzKF, AltmanDG, LepageL, (2001a). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. J Am Med Assoc285: 1992–1995.
82.
MoherD, SchulzKF, AltmanDG (2001b). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med134: 657–662.
83.
NavazeshM (1995). Tartar-control toothpaste as a possible contributory factor in the onset of superficial mucocele: a case report. Spec Care Dentist15: 74–78.
O'MullaneDM (1976). Efficiency in clinical trials of caries preventive agents and methods. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol4: 190–194.
86.
PetittiDB (2000). Meta-analysis, decision analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods for quantitative synthesis in medicine.2nd ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
87.
PledgerGW (1992). Basic statistics: importance of adherence. J Clin Res Pharmacoepidemiol6: 77–81.
88.
PocockSJ (1983). Clinical trials: a practical approach.New York: Wiley.
89.
ProskinHM, KingmanA, NalewayC, WozniakWT (1995). Comparative attributes for the description of the relative efficacy of therapeutic agents: general concepts and definitions, and application to the American Dental Association guidelines for the comparison of the clinical anticaries efficacy of fluoride dentifrices. J Clin Dent6: 176–184.
90.
RadikeAW (1972). Examiner error and reversals in diagnosis. In: Proceedings of the conference on the clinical testing of cariostatic agents.Chicago, IL: American Dental Association.
91.
RichardsD, LawrenceA, SackettDL (1997). Bringing an evidence-base to dentistry. Community Dent Health14(2): 63–65.
92.
SchuirmannDJ (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm15: 657–680.
93.
SchwartzD, LellouchJ (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chron Dis20: 637–648.
94.
SennS (1998). Some controversies in planning and analyzing multi-centre trials. Stat Med17: 1753–1765.
95.
ShapiroSH, GlassKC (2000). Why Sackett's analysis of randomized controlled trials fails, but needn't. Canadian Med Assoc J163: 834–835.
96.
SlackGL, MartinWJ (1964). The use of a dentifrice containing stannous fluoride in the control of dental caries. Br Dent J117: 275–280.
97.
StrausSE, SackettDL (1998). Using research findings in clinical practice. BMJ317(7154): 339–342.
98.
US Department of Health and Human Services (1991). National Institutes of Health OPRR Reports: Code of Federal Regulations: (45 CFT 46) Protection of Human Subjects (http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/polasur.htm). Weijer C, Shapiro SH, Glass KC (2000). Why clinical equipoise, and not the uncertainty principle, is the moral underpinning of the RCT. BMJ321: 756–758.
99.
WeinsteinP, MilgromP, SanghviH (1995). Recruitment issues: errors of omission in dental research. J Dent Res74: 1028–1029.
100.
WenzelA, AnthonisenPN, JuulMB (2000). Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behavior: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography. Caries Res34: 214–218.
101.
WhiteheadJ (1986). Sample sizes for phase II and phase III clinical trials: an integrated approach. Stat Med5: 459–464.
102.
WiensBL, IglewiczB (2000). Design and analysis of three treatment equivalence trials. Control Clin Trials21: 127–137.
103.
WilliamsJE, DonnellyCJ, FultonJT (1967). An appraisal of the necessity for radiographs in clinical trials of caries-inhibitory agents. J Pub Health Dent27: 54–62.