In synovial joints, friction between articular surfaces leads to shear stress within the cartilaginous tissue, which might result in tissue rupture and failure. Joint friction depends on synovial lubrication of the articular surfaces, which can be altered due to compressive loading. Therefore, we hypothesized that the frictional coefficient of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is affected by the magnitude and duration of loading. We tested this by measuring the frictional coefficient in 20 intact porcine TMJs using a pendulum-type friction tester. The mean frictional coefficient was 0.0145 (SD 0.0027) after a constant loading of 50 N during 5 sec. The frictional coefficient increased with the length of the preceding loading duration and exceeded 0.0220 (SD 0.0014) after 1 hr. Application of larger loading (80 N) resulted in significantly larger frictional coefficients. In conclusion, the frictional coefficient in the TMJ was proportional to the magnitude and duration of joint loading.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ateshian GA (1997). A theoretical formation for boundary friction in articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng119:81–86.
2.
Ateshian GA, Lai WM, Zhu WB, Mow VC (1994). An asymptotic solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers. J Biomech27:1347–1360.
3.
Beek M, Koolstra JH, van Ruijven LJ, van Eijden TM (2001). Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the cartilaginous structures in the human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res80:1913–1918.
4.
Boyd RL, Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Richmond AF, Laskin JL (1990). Temporomandibular joint forces measured at the condyle of Macaca arctoides. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop97:472–479.
5.
Burger EH, Klein-Nulend J, Veldhuijzen JP (1992). Mechanical stress and osteogenesis in vitro. J Bone Miner Res7:S397–S401.
6.
Dijkgraaf LC, de Bont LG, Boering G, Liem RSB (1995). The structure, biochemistry, and metabolism of osteoarthrotic cartilage: a review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg53:1182–1192.
7.
Forster H, Fisher J (1996). The influence of loading time and lubricant on the friction of articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]210:109–119.
8.
Forster H, Fisher J (1999). The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent surface wear on the friction of the articular cartilage. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]213:329–345.
9.
Hohl TH, Tucek WH (1982). Measurement of condylar loading forces by instrumented prosthesis in the baboon. J Maxillofac Surg10:1–7.
10.
Kim KW, Wong ME, Helfrick JF, Thomas JB, Athanasiou KA (2003). Biomechanical tissue characterization of the superior joint space of the porcine temporomandibular joint. Ann Biomed Eng31:924–930.
11.
Linn FC (1967). Lubrication of animal joints. I. The arthrotipsometer. J Bone Joint Surg Am49(A):1079–1098.
12.
Mabuchi K, Tsukamoto Y, Obara T, Yamaguchi T (1994). The effect of additive hyaluronic acid on animal joints with experimentally reduced lubricating ability. J Biomed Mater Res28:865–870.
13.
Mabuchi K, Obara T, Ikegami K, Yamaguchi T, Kanayama T (1999). Molecular weight independence of the effect of additive hyaluronic acid on the lubricating characteristics in synovial joints with experimental deterioration. Clin Biomech14:352–356.
14.
Nickel JC, McLachlan KR (1994a). In vitro measurement of the frictional properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol39:323–331.
15.
Nickel JC, McLachlan KR (1994b). In vitro measurement of the stress-distribution properties of the pig temporomandibular joint disc. Arch Oral Biol39:439–448.
16.
Nitzan DW (1994). Intraarticular pressure in the functioning human temporomandibular joint and its alteration by uniform elevation of the occlusal plane. J Oral Maxillofac Surg52:671–679.
17.
Nitzan DW (2001). The process of lubrication impairment and its involvement in temporomandibular joint disc displacement: a theoretical concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg59:36–45.
18.
Scapino RP, Canham PB, Finlay HM, Mills DK (1996). The behaviour of collagen fibers in stress relaxation and stress distribution in the jaw-joint disc of rabbits. Arch Oral Biol41:1039–1052.
19.
Schurz J, Ribitsch V (1987). Rheology of synovial fluid. Biorheology24:385–399.
20.
Tanaka E, van Eijden T (2003). Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med14:138–150.
21.
Tanaka E, Aoyama J, Tanaka M, Watanabe M, Hattori Y, Hanaoka K, et al. (2002). Biomechanical response of bovine temporomandibular joint disk to prolonged tensile stress. Arch Oral Biol47:413–416.
22.
Tanaka E, Hanaoka K, van Eijden T, Tanaka M, Watanabe M, Nishi M, et al. (2003). Dynamic shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc. J Dent Res82:228–231.
23.
Tanaka E, Kawai N, Hanaoka K, van Eijden T, Sasaki A, Aoyama J, et al. (2004). Shear properties of the temporomandibular joint disc in relation to compressive and shear strain. J Dent Res (in press).
24.
Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M (1991). The elastic modulus of the temporomandibular joint disc from adult dogs. J Dent Res70:1545–1548.
Zhu W, Mow VC, Koob TJ, Eyre DR (1993). Viscoelastic shear properties of articular cartilage and the effects of glycosidase treatments. J Orthop Res11:771–781.
