In the past decade, an encompassing transitional justice process has been developed in Tunisia, which interacts with various other policy domains, including that of development. This article foregrounds three important interrelated innovations of Tunisia's transitional justice process: The explicit attention to economic crimes and violations of economic, social, and cultural rights; the introduction of the notion of victim regions; and the conceptualization of collective reparation programs. I discuss these innovations in light of the ongoing debate about the collective reparations dilemma in transitional societies, and notably about the ideal relation between (collective) reparation programs and development. The article then introduces the notion of disruptive reparations to theorize this relation in a way that foregrounds the need to consider and disrupt the political, socio-economic, and epistemic structures that facilitated the initial harm. This exercise acknowledges the specificity of various policy domains, and approaches them in a way that is fundamentally rooted in victims’ justice needs.
AndrieuK. (2016). Confronting the dictatorial past in Tunisia: Human rights and the politics of victimhood in transitional justice discourses since 2011. Human Rights Quarterly, 38(2), 261–293. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0028
2.
AndrieuK.FerchichiW.RobinsS.AlouiA.ben HamzaH. (2015). To Participate Is to Have Hope. Victim Participation in Tunisia’s Transitional Justice Process. CADH, Kadem, Impunity Watch.
3.
Antonakis-NashifA. (2018). Contested Transformation: Mobilized Publics in Tunisia between Compliance and Protest. In H. Wimmen & M. Asseburg (Eds.), Dynamics of Transformation, Elite Change and New Social Mobilization. Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Yemen (pp. 128–149). Routledge.
4.
CarranzaR. (2009). The Right to Reparations in Situations of Poverty. ICTJ Briefing. ICTJ.
5.
CarranzaR.Azer ZouariM. (2020). Work, Freedom, Dignity: For Young Tunisians, the Revolution Was Not Only About Accountability for Corruption. ICTJ Briefing Paper. International Center for Transitional Justice.
6.
DavidsonN. R. (2017). Alien tort statute litigation and transitional justice: Bringing the Marcos case back to the Philippines. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijx006
7.
de GreiffP. (2006). Justice and reparations. In P. de Greiff, (Ed.), The Handbook of Reparations (pp. 451–477). Oxford University Press.
8.
de GreiffP. (2020). The future of the past: Reflections on the present state and prospects of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijaa013
9.
DestrooperT.BelghithS. (2022). Active Invisibilization or Invisible Activism? Tunisia’s Truth and Dignity Commission and the (Non-) Debate over Circular 108 on Banning the Headscarf. In S. Robins, P. Gready, & S. Mohyeldeen, (Eds.), Transitional Justice in Tunisia: Innovations, Continuities, Challenges (pp. 175–193). Routledge.
10.
ElaN. (2017). Litigation Dilemmas: Lessons from the Marcos Human Rights Class Action. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(2), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12207
11.
FalkR. (2006). Reparations, International Law, and Global Justice: A New Frontier. In P. de Greiff (Ed.), The Handbook of Reparations (pp. 478–503). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199291926.003.0014..
12.
FirchowP. (2013). Must Our Communities Bleed to Receive Social Services? Development Projects and Collective Reparations Schemes in Colombia. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 8(3), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2013.863689
13.
FreemanM. (2006). Back to the future: The historical dimension of liberal justice. In M. du Plessis & S. Peté, (Eds.), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparation for Gross Human Rights Abuses (pp. 29–51). Intersentia.
14.
GrayD. H. (2018). “Who Hears My Voice Today?” Indirect Women Victims in Tunisia. International Centre for Transitional Justice.
15.
GreadyP.VandenholeW. (2014). Human Rights and Development in the New Millennium: Towards a Theory of Change. Routledge.
16.
GreadyS. (2022). Reparations in post-revolution Tunisia. At the intersection of innovation and politicisation. In S. Robins & P. Gready (Eds.), Transitional Justice in Tunisia (pp. 231–249). Routledge.
HamberB. (2000). Repairing the irreparable: Dealing with the double-binds of making reparations for crimes of the past. Ethnicity & Health, 5(3–4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/713667456
19.
KetelaarsE. (2018). Gendering Tunisia’s transition: Transformative gender justice outcomes in times of transitional justice turmoil?International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12, 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijy016
20.
LamontC. K.PannwitzH. (2016). Transitional justice as elite justice? Compromise justice and transition in Tunisia. Global Policy, 7(2), 278–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12291
21.
RobinsS.DestrooperT. (2022). Conclusion. In S. Robins, P. Gready, & S. Mohyeldeen, (Eds.), Transitional Justice in Tunisia: Innovations, Continuities, Challenges.Routledge.
22.
RobinsS.GreadyP.AlouiA.AndrieuK.ben HamzaH.FerchichiW. (2022). Transitional justice from the margins: Collective reparations and Tunisia’s truth and dignity commission. Political Geography, 94, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102565
SalongaJ. R. (2000). Presidential Plunder: The Quest for the Marcos Ill-Gotten Wealth. U.P. Center for Leadership, Citizenship and Democracy. https://books.google.be/books?id=41COAAAAMAAJ.
25.
TarusariraJ. (2019). The anatomy of apology and forgiveness: Towards transformative apology and forgiveness. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 13(1), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijz006
26.
TeitelR. (2014). Globalizing Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press.
27.
Truth and Dignity Commission (2019). The Final Comprehensive Report—Executive Summary. Truth and Dignity Commission.
UNDP (2020). From Justice for the Past to Peace and Inclusion for the Future: A Development Approach to Transitional Justice. Lessons Learned from UNDP Policy and Practice. United Nations Development Programme.
United Nations (2005). Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparations for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law’. United Nations General Assembly.
32.
Uprimny YepesR. (2009). Transformative reparations of massive gross human rights violations: Between corrective and distributive justice. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27(4), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700411
33.
VandenholeW.GreadyP. (2014). Failures and successes of human rights-based approaches to development: Towards a change perspective. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 32(4), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2015.957458
34.
VatthauerJ.-P.Weipert-FennerI. (2017). ‘The Quest for Social Justice in Tunisia: Socioeconomic Protest and Political Democratization Post 2011’. Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: PRIF reports.
35.
ZakiH. A. (2018). Resisting and redefining state violence: The gendered politics of transitional justice in Tunisia. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa, 9(4), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520844.2018.1544005
36.
ZemniS. (2015). Returning to the Tunisian revolution: Some reflections on political change during the arab spring. In C. Lamont, J. van der Harst, & F. Gaenssmantel, (Eds.), Nonwestern Encounters with Democratization: Imagining Democracy After the Arab Spring (pp. 51–65). Ashgate.
