There is growing evidence that leaders in professional health care chaplaincy recognize the important role of research. The Standards of Practice recently approved by the Association of Professional Chaplains (APC), and especially the standard about research (Standard 12), provide strong evidence that the profession sees research, and research-literate chaplains, as important for its future. The aim of this study was to identify the extent to which Association for Clinical Pastoral Education, Inc (ACPE) accredited clinical pastoral education (CPE) residency programs are preparing their graduates to be the kind of research-literate chaplains described in these Standards. We interviewed CPE supervisors from 26 randomly-selected CPE residency programs. We found 12% of the programs had intentional and substantive research-related curricula, 27% of the programs offered some limited exposure to research, and 62% of the programs provided no education about research. We found also that supervisors often defined “research education” in terms of actually conducting research projects. CPE residency programs potentially play a central role in educating research-literate chaplains. Future research should examine the incentives and barriers that influence the inclusion of research education in CPE residency programs.
Accessed April 14, 2011. Association of Professional Chaplains (APC). (2011). Standards of practice for professional chaplains in long-term care. Available at http://www.professionalchaplains.org/index.aspx?id=1210. Accessed April 14, 2011.
4.
BayP. and IvyS. S. (2006). Chaplaincy research: A case study?The Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling. 60(4): 343–52.
5.
BaughW. J. (2002). Spirituality and data: The need for a new paradigm?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 11–17.
6.
BoisenAT (1971/1936). Exploration of the inner world: A study of mental disorder and religious experience. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
7.
BrownW. N. (2002). Chaplains and science?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 29–41.
8.
CadgeW. (2010). Hospital chaplains: Listening to what they say and watching what they do. Presentation: Association of Professional Chaplains Annual Conference. Schaumburg, IL.
9.
CareyL. B. and NewellC. (2002). Clinical Pastoral Education and the value of empirical research: Examples from Australian and New Zealand datum?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 53–65.
10.
DerricksonP. and Van HiseA. (2010). Curriculum for a spiritual pathway project: Integrating research methodology into pastoral care training?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 16(1): 3–12.
11.
EhmanJ. (2004). Twelve guiding questions for incorporating research into a CPE curriculumPresentation: ACPE Annual Conference. Portland, ME. Available at http://acperesearch.net Accessed February 28, 2011.
12.
FitchettG. (2002). Health care chaplaincy as a research-informed profession: How we get there?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 67–72.
13.
FlorellJ. L. (1973). A symposium on pastoral research?Journal of Pastoral Care. 27(4): 263–266.
14.
GibbonsJ. L. and MylerD. C. (1978). Research as a curricular component in CPE. Journal of Supervision and Training in Ministry. 1: 36–45.
15.
GleasonJ. J. (2004). Pastoral research: Past, present, and future?The Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling. 58(4): 295–306.
16.
HaugkK. C. and WeberT. T. (1980). The debunking exercise: Teaching research experientially in pastoral care and counseling?The Journal of Pastoral Care. 34(2): 104–8.
17.
HilsmanG. J. (2002). Siblings or foes: What now in spiritual care research?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 81–9.
18.
HoverM. (1997). Teaching research skills in Clinical Pastoral Education?Theological Education. 33(2): 1–11.
19.
HoverM. (2002). Research or perish?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 91–7.
20.
IvyS. S. (2002). Chaplain yes and chaplain no: Both are correct; neither is true?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 103–12.
21.
JensenM. E. (2002). Language and tools for professional accountability?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 113–23.
22.
KoenigH. G. (2008). Why research is important for chaplains?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 14(2): 83–90.
23.
LawrenceR. J. (2002). Four fatal flaws in recent spirituality research?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 125–30.
24.
LeasR.D. (2009). Anton Theophilus Boisen: His life, work, impact, and theological legacy. Decatur, GA: Journal of Pastoral Care Publications, Inc.
25.
LucasA. M. (2002). At the poles eventually all you get is cold?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 143–50.
26.
McCurdyD. B. (2002). But what are we trying to prove?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 12(1): 151–63.
27.
McSherryE.KratzD., & NelsonW. (1986). Pastoral care departments: More necessary in the DRG era?Health Care Management Review. 11(1): 47–59.
28.
McSherryE. (1987). The need and appropriateness of measurement and research in chaplaincy: Its criticalness for patient care and chaplain department survival post-1987. Journal of Heath Care Chaplaincy. (1)1: 3–41.
29.
MillspaughD. (2002). She said, some patient needs get dropped due to more pressing issues?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 13(1): 165–70.
30.
MorinM-L. (2002). Respecting the dual sided identity of Clinical Pastoral Education and professional chaplaincy: The phenomenological research model?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 13(1): 171–83.
31.
MorrisR. A. (1986). Pastoral research: A definition and elaboration?The Journal of Pastoral Care. 40(1): 21–8.
32.
MurphyP. and FitchettG. (2010). Introducing chaplains to research: “This could help me.”Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 16(3): 79–94.
33.
MyersW. R. (1996). Keeping the faith while doing research in ministry?The Journal of Pastoral Care. 50(2): 201–4.
34.
O'ConnerT. S. (2002A). The search for truth: The case for evidence based chaplaincy. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 13(1): 185–94.
35.
O'ConnorT. S. (2002B). Is evidence based spiritual care an oxymoron?Journal of Religion and Health, 41, 253–262.
36.
O'ConnorT. S. and MeakesE. (1998). Hope in the midst of challenge: Evidence-based pastoral care. Journal of Pastoral Care, 52, 359–367.
37.
OverallS. and HoodL. (2010). Ways of knowing: Possibilities for an ministry specialty project. Presentation to ACPE Research Network, 2010 Annual Meeting, Kansas City, MO. Available at http://www.acperesearch.net/Incorporating_Research.html. Accessed June 29, 2011.
38.
NanceM.S.RamseyK.E., & LeachmanJ.A. (2009). Chaplaincy care pathways and Clinical Pastoral Education. Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling, 63 (1–2): 11-1-4.
39.
RodriguesB. (2002). Health care reform: Opportunities for professional chaplains to build intentional communities of learners by integrating faith, science, quality, and systems thinking?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 13(1): 195–211.
40.
SmithT. R. (1998). The role of research in the future of chaplaincy?Chaplaincy Today, 14(1): 27–9.
41.
SwintonJ. (2002). Rediscovering mystery and wonder: Toward a narrative-based perspective on chaplaincy?Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. 13(1): 223–36.
42.
VandeCreekL. (1988). A research primer for pastoral care and counseling. Journal of Pastoral Care Publications, Inc.Decatur, GA.
43.
VandeCreekL. (1992). Research in the pastoral care department. In BurtonL.A. (Ed.), Chaplaincy services in contemporary heath care (Schaumburg, IL, College of Chaplains), pp. 65–69.
44.
VandeCreekL. (1999). Professional chaplaincy: An absent profession. Journal of Pastoral Care53, 417–432.
45.
VandeCreekL.BenderH., & JordanM. (1994). Research in pastoral care and counseling: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Journal of Pastoral Care Publications. Decatur, GA.
46.
WeaverA. J.FlannellyK. J., & LiuC. (2008). Chaplaincy research: Its value, its quality, and its future. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 14, 3–19.
