Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present research examines situation factors and display cues that contribute to the effectiveness of using a terrain enhanced primary flight display (TE-PFD) for detecting and avoiding potential Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT) accidents. Specifically, the relative importance of the terrain distance, altitude, and presence of an artificial horizon line were investigated. One of the crucial features of the TE-PFD is the inclusion of an artificial horizon line in addition to the natural horizon line provided by the terrain. The present research compared collision detection and avoidance decisions using a TE-PFD both with and without an artificial horizon line. Performance was assessed using the signal detection theory (SDT) parameters of sensitivity and response bias as well as the more traditional analysis of RT. Results indicated that removal of the artificial horizon line not only reduced the perceptual ease in detecting collisions but also altered the decision criterion used to make a collision avoidance response.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bud

M. J.

Hannon

D. J.

Mengert

Ransom

Stearns

(1997). General aviation accidents, 1983-1994: Identification of the factors related to controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents. Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.

Green

D. M.

Swets

J. A.

(1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Guth

P. L.

(1996). MicroDEM [Computer Software]. Severna Park, MD: Petmar Trilobite Breeding Ranch.

Khatwa

Roelen

A. L. C.

, (1996). An analysis of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) accidents of commercial operators, 1988 through 1994. Flight Safety Digest, 15 (4/5), 2–39.

Kuchar

J. K.

Hansman

R. J.

(1991). Advanced terrain displays for transport category aircraft. MIT aeronautical systems laboratories report ASL-91-3. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Kuchar

J. K.

Hansman

R. J.

(1993). Part-task simulation study of candidate terrain alerting displays. MIT aeronautical systems laboratories report ASL-93-6. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Macmillan

N. A.

Creelman

D. A.

(1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Peterson

D. A.

(1999). The effects of experience and training in the use of a terrain enhanced primary flight display for terrain avoidance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.

Schneider

(1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBC-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206–217.

10.

Uhlarik

J. J.

Peterson

D. A.

Herold

J. M.

(1998). Terrain awareness using a terrain enhanced primary flight display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 102–106. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

11.

Wiener

E. L.

(1977). Controlled flight into terrain accidents: System-induced errors. Human Factors, 19(2), 171–181.

The Role of Situational Factors and Display Cues on Collision Detection and Avoidance Using a Terrain Enhanced Primary Flight Display

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References