Visual Search and the Detection of Collision Events during Driving

Abstract

In the present study we examined the accuracy of observers in detecting collision events. Observers were presented with displays simulating a 3D environment with multiple moving objects. We used a signal detection paradigm to determine the ability of observers to detect a collision event when multiple moving objects were present. We also examined whether the task can be performed in parallel or requires attention. The results showed that observers' sensitivity decreased with an increase in the number of distracter objects moving in the scene, suggesting that observers were performing a visual search to determine whether a collision target was present in the display. This finding indicates that collision detection when multiple-moving objects are present is not processed in parallel. In addition, the results indicated that sensitivity increased with an increase in display duration. This suggests that as the collision event became more imminent detection performance increased.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cutting

J. E.

Vishton

P. M.

Braren

P. A.

(1995). How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. Psychological Review, 102, 627–651.

DeLucia

P. R.

Novak

J. B.

(1997). Judgments of relative time-to-contract of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 913–928.

Delucia

P. R.

Warran

(1994). Pictorial and motion-based depth information during active control of self-motion: Size-arrival effects on collision avoidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 783–798.

Kaiser

M. K.

Hecht

(1995). Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fileds. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 817–825.

Kaiser

M. K.

Mowafy

(1993). Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observer's sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1028–1040.

Lee

D. N.

(1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459.

Lee

D. N.

(1980). The optic flow field: The foundation of vision. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 290, 169–179.

Schiff

Detweiler

M. L.

(1979). Information used in judging impending collision. Perception, 8, 647–658.

Todd

J. T.

(1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 795–810.

10.

Tresilian

J. R.

(1990). Perceptual information for the timing of interceptive action. Perception, 19, 223–239.

11.

Tresilian

J. R.

(1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 865–876.

12.

Wann

J. P.

Edgar

Bliar

(1993). Time-to-contact judgment in the locomotion of adults and preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1053–1065.