Objective: To determine whether egocentric distance judgments are accurate in a virtual environment using a perceptual matching task. Methods: Observers were immersed within a virtual environment consisting of an L-shaped room with a test object (a column) located down one corridor and a comparison object (a flagpole) located down the other. Perceived distances were measured by having the observers move the comparison object to match the distance to the test object. Textures in each corridor were independently varied, as was the size of the test object. Results: Significant effects were found for the texture pattern under the test object and for distance, but not for the texture under the comparison object or column size. Performance was best with a regular (brick) pattern. Overall, observers' judgments overestimated distance to the test object by approximately 7%. Conclusions: Egocentric distance judgments were relatively accurate compared to past research. Texture affected performance, with a regular pattern producing highest accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlissJ. P.TidwellP. D.GuestM. A. (1997). The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence, 6, 73–86.
2.
DarkenR. P.BankerW. P. (1998). Navigating in Natural Environments: A Virtual Environment Training Transfer Study. Proceedings of VRAIS ′98, pp. 12–19.
3.
GibsonJ. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
4.
GilinskiA. S. (1951). Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review, 58, 460–482.
5.
HaberR. N. (1985). Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 282–321.
6.
HarwayN. I. (1963). Judgment of distance in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 385–390.
7.
HenryD.FurnessT. (1993). Spatial perception in virtual environments: Evaluating an architectural application. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1993 IEEE, 33–40.
8.
JamesK. R.CairdJ. K. (1995). The Effect of Optic Flow, Proprioception, and Texture on Novice Locomotion in Virtual Environments. Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting. 275–279.
9.
KlineP. B.WitmerB. G. (1996). Distance perception in virtual environments: Effects of field of view and surface texture at near distances. Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting, 40, 1112–1116.
10.
LamptonD. R.McDonaldD. P.SingerM. (1995). Distance estimation in virtual environments. Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 39, 1268–1272.
11.
LoomisJ. M.DaSilvaJ. A.FujitaN.FukusimaS. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906–921.
12.
ReiserJ. J.AshmeadD. H.TalorC. R.YoungquistG. A. (1990). Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675–689.
13.
SinaiM. J.OoiT. L.HeZ. J.. (1998). Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. Nature, (95), 497–500.
14.
SteeniusR. E.GoodaleM. A. (1988). The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist?Journal of Motor Behavior, 220, 399–415.
15.
ThomsonJ. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427–443.
16.
WagnerM. (1985). The metric of visual space. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 483–495.
17.
WallerD.HuntE.KnappD. (1998). The transfer of spatial knowledge in virtual environment training. Presence, 7, 129–143.
18.
WitmerB. G.BaileyJ. H.KnerrB. W.ParsonsK. C. (1996). Virtual spaces and real-world places: Transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 413–428.
19.
WitmerB. G.KlineP. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence, 7, 144–167.
20.
WitmerB. G.SadowskiW. J. (1998). Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors, 40, 478–488.
