Abstract
One symptom of the digital revolution has been the rapid proliferation of information displays on everything from consumer products to automotive dashboards. As devices get smaller and displays are placed in environments where real-estate is at a premium, new methods for representing large quantities of information in small spaces must be developed. In a recent panel discussion on the topic of compact information displays, Christoffersen (1998) raised a dichotomy between “single-sensor-single-indicator” (SSSI) displays (Goodstein, 1981; Vicente and Rasmussen, 1990) and integrated displays. In integrated displays, users pull separate values on each of several variable from a single location on the display. The advantages of integrated displays have been attributed to a number of design factors, but we wondered whether the simple attribute of spatial proximity might account for some of the benefits. To study spatial proximity issues in the lab, we looked at participants abilities to monitor and keep track of the current states of rapidly changing variables that were presented in tight physical proximity vs spatially separated, with each variable presented in a unique location. Our results provide further evidence that there are task contexts in which display integration may not be the appropriate design decision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
