Miller's 7±2 is an oft-cited but misleading heuristic in user interface design. Miller extracted this rule of thumb by examining data on memory span, among other things. However, memory span procedures measure short-term memory at its upper limits and thereby greatly overestimate humans' ability to easily hold in mind unrelated, linguistic material. Justifications for using a maximum of 3 items as a design heuristic are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BaddeleyA. D. (1994). The magical number seven: Still magic after all these years?Psychological Review, 101, 353–356.
3.
ChaseW. G.SimonH. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
4.
CowanN. (1995) Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
CrowderR. G. (1967). Prefix effects in immediate memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 21, 450–461.
6.
EllisN. C.HennellyR. A. (1980). A bilingual word-length effect: Implications for intelligence testing and the relative ease of mental calculations in Welsh and English. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 43–52.
7.
GreeneR. L. (1992). Human memory: Paradigms and paradoxes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
HelanderM. G.LandauerT. K.PrabhuP. V. (Eds.) (1997). Handbook of human-computer interaction (second edition). North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9.
HulmeC.MaughanBrownG.D.A. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term span. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 685–701.
10.
LeCompteD. C. (1996). Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctive-ness: A new approach to the irrelevant speech effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1154–1165.
11.
LeCompteD. C.WatkinsM. J. (1993). Similarity as an organizing principle in short-term memory. Memory, 1, 3–11.
12.
MartinR.C.LeschM. F. (1996). Associations and dissociations between language impairment and list recall: Implications for models of STM. In GathercoleS. E. (Ed.) Models of Short-term Memory, (pp. 149–178). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
14.
NeathI. (1998). Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
SchianoD. J.WatkinsM. J. (1981). Speech-like coding of pictures in short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 9, 100–114.
16.
StiglerLeeStevenson (1986). Digit memory in Chinese and English: Evidence for a temporally limited store. Cognition, 23, 1–20.
17.
TulvingE.PatkauJ. E. (1962). Concurrent effects of contextual constraint and word frequency on immediate recall and learning of verbal material. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 83–95.
18.
WatkinsM. J. (1974). Concept and measurement of primary memory. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95–711.
19.
WatkinsM. J. (1977). The intricacy of memory span. Memory & Cognition, 5, 529–534.
