Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Operations automation is automation intended to replace human controllers by carrying out activities in a manner similar to that used currently by controllers. This paper describes three complementary research efforts addressing operations automation. First, design implications based on two field studies of a prototype NASA operations automation application are summarized. Second, AutoPass, an automation architecture designed to mitigate observed problems and to incorporate, in a principled manner, human-centered automation principles is presented. AutoPass was evaluated to assess the extent to which it provides more robust, and thus, less brittle, automation in comparison to NASA's operational prototype. Finally, Apprentice, a general architecture for operations automation, is described. Apprentice offers atheory for the design of operations automation and proposes a method to address the current bottleneck in implementing robust automation—obtaining and encoding expert knowledge.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billings

C. E.

(1997). Aviation Automation: The Search for a Human-Centered Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Buchanan

B. G.

Wilkins

D. C.

(Eds.). (1993). Knowledge acquisition and learning. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

Bushman

J. B.

Mitchell

C. M.

Jones

P. M.

Rubin

K. S.

(1993). ALLY: An operator's associate for cooperative supervisory control systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(1), 111–128.

Callantine

T. J.

Mitchell

C. M.

Palmer

E. A.

(1997). Tracking operator activities in complex systems: An experimental evaluation using Boeing 757 pilots. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH,.

Giarratano

J. C.

(1993). CLIPS User's Guide (JSC-25013). Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Flight Center.

Hartley

Luczak

Stump

D. M.

. Paper #SO96.6.15. (1996). Spacecraft control center automation using the generic inferential executor (Genie). In Proceedings of the1996 International Symposium on Space Mission Operations and Ground Data Systems, Munich, Germany, #SO96.6.15.

Jones

P. M.

Mitchell

C. M.

(1995). Human-computer cooperative problem solving: Theory, design, and evaluation of an intelligent associate system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25(7), 1039–1053.

Mitchell

C. M.

(1999). Model-based design of human interaction with complex systems. In Sage

A. P.

Rouse

W. B.

(Eds.), Systems engineering & management handbook (pp. in press). New York, NY: John Wiley.

Mitchell

C. M.

Thurman

D. A.

Brann

D. M.

(1998). The human factor in ‘lights-out automation’: Two field studies and associated design issues. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 364–368.

10.

Sarter

N. B.

Woods

D. D.

(1997). Team play with a powerful and independent agent: Operational experiences and automation surprises on the Airbus A-320. Human Factors, 39(4), 553–569.

11.

Thurman

D. A.

(1997). The interactive monitoring and control (IMaC) design methodology: Application and empirical results. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, 289–293.

12.

Thurman

D. A.

Chappell

A. R.

Mitchell

C. M.

(1998). An enhanced architecture for OFMspert: A domain-independent system for intent inferencing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, 955–960.

13.

Thurman

D. A.

Mitchell

C. M.

(1998). Apprentice: A technique for building operations automation. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on System, Man and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA, 967–972.

Operations Automation: Definition,Examples,and a Human-Centered Approach

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References