Exploring the Impact of Advanced Alarms,Displays,and Computerized Procedures on Teams

Abstract

New support technologies embody hypotheses about what constitutes effective support, and how technological change is expected to shape cognition and collaboration. Introduction of these technologies into a field of practice provides an opportunity to test and revise our understanding. An illustrative case is presented that examined the impact of introducing advanced human-system interfaces (HSIs), including a computer-based procedure system, an advanced alarm system, and a graphic display system, into a conventional power plant control room. Crews were observed using the HSIs to handle simulated plant disturbances in a full-scope simulator. The HSIs generally provided positive support and reduced workload as intended. However, unanticipated impacts were also identified. Of particular note was the effect on team structure and communication. The computerized systems altered the distribution of information across crew members and communication patterns, affecting the situation awareness of individual crew members and the crew as a whole. While in a traditional control room, the open environment, and explicit communication requirements foster shared situation awareness, maintaining shared situation awareness in the computerized environment required active work on the part of crew members. The results point to requirements for effectivecollaboration and help define future research direction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carrera

J. P.

Easter

J. R.

Roth

E. M.

(1996). Simulator testing of the Westinghouse AWARE alarm management system. In Proceedings of the IAEA Specialists meeting on Experience and Improvements in Advanced Alarm Annunciation Systems in NPPs, Sept. 16–20, 1996.

Easter

J.R.

Watson

C.D.

(1997). Display Design for Real-Time Process Control: The Engineering Beneath the Art”, IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, June 8-12, 1997, Orlando, FL.

Lipner

M.H.

Orendi

R.G.

(1992). Issues Involved with Computerizing Emergency Operating Procedures. American Nuclear Society AI91: Frontiers in Innovative Computing for the Nuclear Industry, Jackson, Wyoming, September 15–18, 1992.

Kauffman

J.V.

Lanik

G.F.

Trager

Spence

R.A.

(1992). Operating Experience Feedback Report—Human Performance in Operating Events. (NUREG-1275), Washington, D.C.: Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Layton

Smith

P.J.

McCoy

, “Design Of A Cooperative Problem-Solving System For En-Route Flight Planning: An Empirical Evaluation.” Human Factors, Vol. 36, pp. 94–119, 1994.

Mosier

K.L.

Palmer

E.A.

Degani

(1992). “Electronic Checklists: Implications For Decision Making,” in Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36^th Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 7–11.

O'Hara

Brown

Stubler

Wachtel

Persensky

(1996). Human-System Interface Design Review Guideline, NUREG-0700, Rev. 1, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC.

O'Hara

Stubler

Higgins

(1996). Hybrid Human System Interfaces: Human Factors Considerations, BNL Report J6012-T1-4/96, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 1996.

Potter

S. S.

Roth

E. M.

Woods

D. D.

Elm

(in press). BootstrappingMultiple Converging Cognitive Task Analysis Techniques for System Design. In Schraagen

J.M.C.

Chipman

S.F.

Shalin

V.L.

(Eds.) Cognitive Task Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

10.

Roth

E. M.

Malin

J. T.

Schreckenghost

D. L.

(1997). Paradigms for Intelligent Interface Design. In Helander

Landauer

Prabhu

(Eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd edition), Amsterdam: North-Holland. (pp. 1177–1201).

11.

Roth

E.M.

Mumaw

R.J.

Lewis

P.M.

, (1994). An Empirical Investigation of Operator Performance in Cognitively Demanding Simulated Emergencies. (NUREG/CR-6208), Washington, D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

12.

Roth

E. M.

O'Hara

(1998) Integrating Digital and Conventional Human System Interfaces: Lessons Learned from a Control Room Modernization Program. Brookhaven National Laboratory Technical Report prepared for the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

13.

Woods

D. D.

(1998). Designs are hypotheses about how artifacts shape cognition and collaboration. Ergonomics, 41, 168–173.

14.

Woods

D. D.

Johannesen

L. J.

Cook

R. I.

Sarter

N. B.

(1994). Behind Human Error: Cognitive Systems, Computers, and Hindsight. Crew Systems Ergonomic Information and Analysis Center (CSERIAC), Dayton, OH (State of the Art Report).