Over-The-Counter (OTC) Drug Labeling: Format Preferences

Abstract

The present research examines two different consumer groups' perceptions of the readability of OTC medication labels. Twelve labels depicting an OTC medication with a fictitious name were constructed and attached to bottles. The labels varied in (a) print size (4 point, 7 point, 10 point), (b) amount of white space between lines or sections of text (no spacing; label section spacing; and line spacing), and (c) label design (standard vs. extended/pull-out). Ninety-nine older adults and 102 undergraduates rank-ordered the labels according to overall ease of reading. In general, participants preferred the labels printed with larger type and line spacing. White space appeared to have less influence over the rankings than print size for older adults. However, the use of both a larger print size and increased white spacing appeared to influence the undergraduates' ratings. Also, there was no clear preference between the extended and standard label designs but their evaluation was only conducted with for the small print conditions. The implications of these results for the design of OTC medication labels and other consumer products are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Engle

J. P.

(1995). Testimony of the American Pharmaceutical Association: FDA Public Hearing on OTC Drug Labeling, Sept. 29.

Federal

(1999). Vol. 64, no 51, March 17. Over-the-counter Human Drugs: Labeling Requirements. Food and Drug Administration.

Federal

(1991). Vol. 56, no 229, Nov. 27, Dept. of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service.

Frase

L. T.

Schwartz

B. J.

(1979). Typographical cues that facilitate comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 197–206.

Hartley

(1999). What do these instructions mean? Text design, medical information and older readers. In Park

Morrell

Shifren

(Ed.) Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients (pp. 233–248), Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.

Hartley

(1984). Spacing and structure in instructional text. In (Ed.) Easterby

Zwaga

, Information Design (pp. 497–516). NY: Wiley.

Hartley

(1978). Designing instructional text. New York: Nichols.

Kalsher

M. J.

Wogalter

M. S.

Racicot

B. M.

(1996). Pharmaceutical container labels: Enhancing preference perceptions with alternative designs and pictorials. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 18. 83–90.

Morrow

D. G.

Leirer

V. O.

Andrassy

J. M.

Hier

C. M.

Menard

W. E.

(1998). The influence of list format and category headers on age differences in understanding medication instructions. Experimental Aging Research, 24, 231–256.

10.

Morrow

D. G.

Leirer

V. O.

Andrassy

J. M.

Tanke

E. D.

Stine-Morrow

E. A. L.

(1996). Medication instruction design: Younger and older adult schemas for taking medications. Human Factors, 38. 556–573.

11.

Morrow

D. G.

Leirer

V. O.

Sheikh

(1988). Adherence and medication instructions: Review and recommendations. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 36. 1147–1160.

12.

NDMA (1996). Label Readability Guidelines. Over-the-counter Drug Labeling. 1–16.

13.

Silver

N. C.

Braun

C. C.

(1993). Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles. Safety Science, 16, pp. 615–625.

14.

Smither

J. A.

Braun

C. C.

(1994). Readability of prescription drug labels by older and younger adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 1, 149–159.

15.

Tullis

T. A.

(1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors, 25. 657–682.

16.

US Food and Drug Administration (1995). Public Hearing on Over-the-counter Drug Labeling, Washington, DC, Sept. 29.

17.

Vigilante

W. J.

Jr. Wogalter

M. S.

(1997). The Preferred Order of Over-the-counter (OTC) Pharmaceutical Label Components. Drug Information Journal, 31. 973–988.

18.

Vanderplas

J. M.

Vanderplas

J. H.

(1980). Some factors affecting legibility of printed materials for older adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50. 923–932.

19.

Wogalter

M. S.

Forbes

R. M.

Barlow

(1993). Alternative product label designs Increasing the surface area and print size. In Proceedings of Interface 93 (pp. 181–186). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

20.

Wogalter

M. S.

Kalsher

M. J.

Litynski

D. M.

(1996). Influence of food label quantifier terms on connoted amount and purchase intention. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 181–186). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

21.

Wogalter

M. S.

Magurno

A. B.

Dietrich

D. A.

Scott

K. L.

(1999). Enhancing information acquisition for over-the-counter medications by making better use of container surface space. Experimental Aging Research, 25. 27–48.

22.

Wogalter

M. S.

Post

(1989). Printed tutorial instructions: Effects of text format and screen pictographs on human-computer task performance. In Proceedings on Interface 89 (pp. 133–138). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

23.

Young

S. L.

Laughery

K. R.

Bell

(1992). Effects of two type density characteristics on the legibility of print. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 504–508). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.