Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Dyre, Warren, and Garness (1996) found that heading performance during active control differed qualitatively from heading performance during passive viewing, though it was unclear exactly why. Our study examined the relationships between field of view, mental workload, and heading perception. We assessed heading performance during active control and passive viewing with a 30° field of view (Dyre et al. used 90°). Subjective mental workload ratings were collected to assess its relationship to active and passive perception of heading. We found results contrary to those of Dyre et al. (1996): heading perception was less accurate during active control than passive viewing and the relationship between simulated velocity and heading performance was reversed. Further, subjective mental workload was higher during active control than during passive viewing. These results suggest that field of view is an important optical variable mediating heading perception during active control.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

G. J.

(1986). Perception of self-motion: Psychophysical and computational approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1) 52–65.

Crowell

J. A.

Banks

M. S.

(1993). Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics, 53 (3), 325–337.

Dyre

B. P.

Andersen

G. J.

(1997). Image velocity magnitudes influence perception of heading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23 (2), 546–565.

Dyre

B. P.

Warren

Garness

(1996). Active control vs. passive perception of heading: Evidence for different perceptual mechanisms. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 1207–1211). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Hart

S. G.

Staveland

L. E.

(1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock

P.A.

Meshkati

(Eds.), Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Larish

J. F.

Andersen

G. J.

(1995). Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: The detection of orientation change. Perception & Psychophysics, 57 (4), 533–545.

Leibowitz

H.W.

Post

R. B.

(1980, June). The two modes of processing concept and some implications. NATO Symposium on the Study of Motion Perception, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.

Warren

(1976). The perception of egomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 448–456.

Warren

W. H.

Morris

M. W.

Jr. Kalish

(1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14,646–660.

Small Fields of view Interfere with Perception of Heading during Active Control But not Passive Viewing

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References