Use of Global Optical Flow Rate and Discontinuity Rate Depends on Their Validity as Determinants of Egospeed

Abstract

Previous research found both discontinuity rate and global optical flow rate contribute to the perception of egospeed but differed in estimates of which source of information dominated. This research examined two methodological differences that may explain the conflicting results: frame rate, and the relative validity of discontinuity rate and flow rate as determinants of egospeed. Observers estimated egospeed perceived during simulations of self-motion. Discontinuity rate and flow rate were manipulated independently by varying velocity and altitude. Frame rates were consistent with Dyre (1997) and the validity of discontinuity rate and flow rate as determinants of egospeed was varied. We found the relative use of discontinuity rate and flow rate was related to the validity of these sources of information. Frame rate was not an important factor. These results suggest the visual system is sensitive to multiple sources of information for perceiving egospeed and adapts to the most optimal source.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Denton

G. G.

(1980). The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Perception, 9, 393–402.

Dyre

B. P.

(1997). Perception of accelerating self-motion: Global optical flow rate dominates discontinuity rate. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2, 1333–1337.

Larish

J. F.

Flach

J. M.

(1990). Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 529–532.

Owen

D. H.

Wolpert

Warren

(1984). Effects of optical flow acceleration, edge acceleration, and viewing time on the perception of egospeed acceleration. In Owen

D. H.

(Ed.) Optical flow and texture variables useful in detecting decelerating and accelerating self-motion. (Interim technical report for Contract No. F33615-83-K-0038, Task 2313-T3, pp. 79–133). Columbus: Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Aviation Psychology Laboratory.