Effect of Maximum Acceptable vs. Maximum Capacity Instructions for Three Lifting Tasks

Abstract

Psychophysical techniques for establishing lifting guidelines are used by industry and the military. The instructions used during industrial research refer to maximum acceptable lifts (MAL), while the military uses maximum capacity lifts (MCL). The purpose of this study was to determine male and female soldiers' load selections using two sets of instructions (MAL and MCL) and two lift heights (floor-knuckle and knuckle-shoulder) for three lifting tasks (one-repetition maximum, 1-hr and 8-hr repetitive lifting). Thirteen male and 13 female soldiers participated in this study. A repeated measures analysis of variance identified main effects. Newman-Keuls Comparison of Means were used to examine significant interactions. Results revealed no difference due to instructions. Men selected a greater load than women, and greater loads were selected for floor-knuckle versus knuckle-shoulder (p < 0.05). Although slight differences were seen between loads selected by industrial workers vs. soldiers, the research results appear comparable for repetitive lifting but not for single lifts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ciriello

V. M.

Snook

S. H.

Blick

A. C.

Wilkinson

P. L.

(1990). The effects of task duration on psychophysically-determined maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 33(2):187–200.

Fitzgerald

P. I.

Vogel

J. A.

Daniels

W. L.

(1986). The body composition project: A summary report and descriptive data. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Technical Report T5/87.

Gordon

Churchill

T. C.

Clauser Bradtmiller

McConville

Tebbetts

Walker

1988. Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: Methods and summary statistics. U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA.

Military standard human engineering design criteria for military systems, equipment and facilities (MIL-STD-1472D). (1989). Naval Publications and Forms Center, Philadelphia, PA.

Rice

V. J.

Sharp

M. A.

(1994). Prediction of performance on two stretcher-carry tasks. Work, 4(3), 201–210.

Sharp

M. A.

(1997). Women soldier's manual lifting capacity. In Optimizing the Performance of Women in the Armed Forces of NATO, AC/243 (Panel8) TP/13, pp 5.1–5.9.

Sharp

M. A.

Rice

Nindl

Mello

(1995). Maximum acceptable lift and carry in two-person teams (640–644). In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Sharp

M. A.

Rice

V. J.

Nindl

B. C.

Williamson

T. L.

(1993). Maximum team lifting capacity as a function of team size. TR T94–3, Natick, MA: US Army Research of Environmental Medicine, Occupational Physiology Division.

Snook

S. H.

(1978). The design of manual handling tasks. Ergonomics 21 (12):963–985.

10.

Snook

S. H.

Ciriello

V. M.

(1991). The design of manual handling tasks: Revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 34(9):1197–1213.

11.

Snook

R. H.

Campanelli

A. R.

Hart

W. J.

(1978). A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury. Journal of Occupational Medicine 20:478–481.

12.

Teves

M. A.

McGrath

J. M.

Knapik

J. J.

Legg

S. J.

1986. An ergometer for maximal effort repetitive lifting. Proceedings of the Eight Annual Conference of the IEEE/Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 592–593.