Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Traditional psychophysical research on perception of heading is characterized by an observer passively viewing a self-motion display. However, some studies suggest that active observers form different perceptions than passive observers, which challenges the relevance of traditional studies of heading to issues of vehicular control. The present study examined whether observers who actively control their self-motion perceive heading differently than those who passively view a self-motion display. We examined heading performance during both active control of yaw and passive observation using a manual control paradigm. The results indicated that observers who actively controlled their yaw perceived heading in a manner that was qualitatively different than observers who passively viewed a self-motion display. Moreover, the results suggest that active observers learn to use relevant display information that passive observers overlook. These results cast doubt on the relevance of traditional psychophysical research on heading to the issue of vehicular control.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armstrong

H. G.

(1939) Principles and practice of aviation medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.

Crowell

J. A.

Banks

M. S.

(1993). Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(3), 325–337.

Cutting

J. E.

(1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dhenin

(Ed.). (1978). Aviation medicine: Physiology and human factors. London: Tri-Med Books.

Gibson

J. J.

(1947). Motion Picture Testing and Research. (Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Research Reports, no. 7). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Gibson

J. J.

(1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.

Held

Hein

(1963). Movement produced stimulation in the development of visually coupled behavior. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 56, 872–876.

Kleiss

J. A.

Hubbard

D. C.

(1993). Effects of three types of flight simulator visual scene detail on detection of altitude. Human Factors, 35, 653–671.

Koenderink

J. J.

van Doom

A. J.

(1981). Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 953–957.

10.

Larish

J. F.

Andersen

G. J.

(1995). Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: The detection of orientation change. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(4), 533–545.

11.

Perrone

J. A.

(1992). Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 9(2), 177–194.

12.

Poulton

E. C.

(1974). Tracking Skill and Manual Control. New York: Academic Press.

13.

Prazdny

(1980). Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow. Biological Cybernetics, 36, 87–102.

14.

Reason

Brand

J. J.

(1975). Motion Sickness. London: Academic Press.

15.

Rolnick

Lubow

R. E.

(1991). Why is the driver rarely motion sick? The role of controllability in motion sickness. Ergonomics, 34, 867–879.

16.

Royden

C. S.

Banks

M. S.

Crowell

J. A.

(1992). The perception of heading during eye movements. Nature, 360, 583–585.

17.

Warren

(1976). The perception of egomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 448–456.

18.

Warren

(1988). Active psychophysics: Theory and practice. In Ross

H. K.

(Ed.), Fechner Day 1988. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 47–52). Stirling, Scotland: University of Stirling.

19.

Warren

MacMillan

G. R.

(1984). Altitude control using action-demanding interactive displays: Toward an active psychophysics, Proceedings of the 1984 IMAGE3 Conference (pp. 37–51). Phoenix, AZ: Air Force Human Resources Lab.

20.

Warren

W. H.

Morris

M. W.

Jr. Kalish

(1988). Perception of translational heading from optical flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 646–660.

Active Control vs. Passive Perception of Heading: Evidence for Different Perceptual Mechanisms

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References