The Effects of Exercise and Alternating Task Modules in Skill Acquisition

Abstract

One class of theories of the spacing effect suggests that arousal may inhibit learning during massed practice. The goal of this study was explore the role of exercise on the spacing effect. Participants practiced three complex tasks (i.e., Space Fortress, algebra word problems, and a desk-top flight simulator) under four training conditions. Participants trained under massed or alternating task modules regimes, with or without moderate exercise. Results indicated that alternating tasks enhanced acquisition and retention performance on Space Fortress. In addition, exercise inhibited retention performance. These same trends were obtained for algebra word problem solving and for a desktop flight simulator task. These findings replicate previous studies showing an advantage for alternating task modules and challenge theories suggesting that the spacing effect is the result of deficient processing due to lower arousal level. Results suggest that exercise may reduce mental rehearsal or implicit processes that alternating task modules promote.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baddeley

A. D.

Longman

D. J. A.

(1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627–635.

Catalano

J. F.

(1967). Arousal as a factor in reminiscence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 1171–1180.

Cuddy

L. J.

Jacoby

L. L.

(1982). When forgetting helps memory: An analysis of repetition effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 451–467.

Druckman

Bjork

R. A.

(Eds.). (1991). In the mind's eye: Enhancing human performance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Easterbrook

J. A.

(1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183–201.

Eich

J. E.

(1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. Psychological Review, 92, 1–38.

Glenberg

A. M.

(1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory and Cognition, 7, 95–112.

Goettl

B. P.

Yadrick

R. M.

Connolly-Gomez

Regian

J. W.

Shebilske

W. L.

(in press). Alternating Task Modules in Isochronal Distributed Training of Complex Tasks. Human Factors..

Gopher

Weil

Bareket

(1994). Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Human Factors, 36, 387–405.

10.

Hintzman

D. L.

(1976). Repetition and memory. In Bower

G. H.

(Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 10, pp. 47–91). New York: Academic Press.

11.

Hockey

Hamilton

(1983). The cognitive patterning of stress states. In Hockey

G. R. J.

(Ed.), Stress and human performance (pp. 331–362). New York: Wiley.

12.

Kesner

R. P.

(1984). The neurobiology of memory: Implicit and explicit assumptions. In Lynch

McGaugh

J. L.

Weinberger

N. M.

(Eds.), Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (pp. 111–118). New York: Guilford Press.

13.

Landers

D. M.

(1980). The arousal-performance relationship revisited. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51, 77–90.

14.

Mané

Donchin

(1989). The space fortress game. Acta Psychologica, 71, 17–22.

15.

Mayer

R. E.

(1981). Frequency norms and structural analyses of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates. Instructional Science, 10, 135–175.

16.

Smith

S. M.

Rothkopf

E. Z.

(1984). Contextual enrichment and distribution of practice in the classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 341–358.

17.

Tomporowski

P. D.

Ellis

N. R.

(1986). Effects of exercise on cognitive processes: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 338–346.