An experiment was performed to examine adults' perceptions of other adults' and children's perceptions of risk. The differences in how adults assess risk to themselves, to other adults, and to children based on their own perceptions and on the perceptions they believe the “others” will hold for themselves were explored. Results found that adult subjects do judge risk as greater for others than for themselves, particularly for young children. A “superiority bias” was found, such that products were assessed to be more risky for others than others would assess for themselves. Implications of a discrepancy between the perceptions adults assign to children and the perceptions of children themselves is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
EichelbergerM. R.GotschallC. S.FeelyH. B.HarstadP.BowmanL. (1990). Parental attitudes and knowledge of child safety. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 144, 714–720
2.
FischhoffB.SlovicP.LichtensteinS.ReadS.CombsB. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152
3.
GärlingA.GärlingT. (1991). The ability of mothers of young children to anticipate potential home accidents. Children's Environments Quarterly, 8, 24–30
4.
GodfreyS. S.LaugheryK. L. (1984). The biasing effects of product familiarity on consumers' awareness of hazard. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting, 483–486
5.
GoldhaberG. M.deTurckM. A. (1988). Effectiveness of warning signs: “Familiarity effects.”Forensic Reports, 1, 281–301
6.
HiebertE. H.AdamsC. S. (1987). Fathers' and mothers' perceptions of their preschool children's emergent literacy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 25–37
7.
HuntJ. M.ParaskevopoulosJ. (1980). Children's psychological development as a function of the inaccuracy of their mothers' knowledge of their abilities. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 136, 285–298
8.
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1972). The actor and observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In JonesE. E.KarouseD. E.KelleyH.H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attributions: Perceiving the causes of behavior.Morristown, N. J.: General Learning Press
9.
PetersonL.FarmerJ.KashaniJ. (1990). Parental injury prevention endeavors: A function of health beliefs?Health Psychology, 9, 177–191
10.
RivaraF. P.HowardD. (1982). Parental knowledge of child development and injury risks. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 3, 103–105
11.
RossL. D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press
12.
SheehyN. P.ChapmanA. J. (1982). Eliciting children's and adults' accounts of road accidents. Current Psychological Review, 2, 341–348
13.
SheehyN. P.ChapmanA. J. (1986). Accidents, perceptions of danger, and the social context: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Community Psychology14, 307–314
14.
SlovicP.FischhoffB.LichtensteinS. (1979). Rating the risks. Environment, 21, 14–20, 36–39
15.
United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. (1989). NEISS Data Highlights.Washington, DC: Author
16.
VaubelK. P. (1990). Effects of warning explicitness on consumer product purchase intentions. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting, 513–517
17.
VaubelK. P.YoungS. L. (1992). Components of perceived risk for consumer products. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 494–498
18.
WalesaC. (1977). Development of risk perception in children and adolescents. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 8, 171–176
19.
WogalterM.DesaulniersD.BrelsfordJ. (1986). Perceptions of consumer products: Hazardousness and warning expectations. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, 1197–1201
20.
YoungS. L. (1995). Components of perceived risk for consumer products (Doctoral dissertation, Rice University)
