The study of decision making in high-hazard industries has recently shifted from the traditional focus on control room operators to other actors in the sociotechnical system, including designers and management. I discuss the importance of hierarchy and specialization in organizational decision making, drawing on research in organizational psychology, sociology, and related disciplines.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC.SchonD. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective.Reading Ma: Addison-Wesley.
2.
CarrollJ. S. (1994). Managing and organizing for safety in nuclear power plants: How plants fail to discover and fix problems. In Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Safety Science: Safety science for life, production, and the environment.Budapest: Meeting Budapest Organizer Ltd., pp. 209–220.
3.
DoughertyD. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science3:179–202.
4.
International Atomic Energy Agency. (1988). Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants: A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group.Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. (75–INSAG-3).
5.
IEEE Spectrum. (1987). Anatomy of a tragedy. IEEE Spectrum, 24(2), 44–51.
6.
KlaymanJ.HaY. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211–228.
7.
LaugheryK. R.Sr. (1991). President's message. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 34(12), 12.
8.
MarcusA. A. (1994). Problem awareness and solution implementation at different management levels.Minneapolis: U. Minnesota Carlson School of Management, unpub. ms.
9.
MorayN. P.HueyB. M., (eds.) (1988). Human factors research and nuclear safety.Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
10.
PetroskiH. (1992). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design.New York: Vintage.
11.
RasmussenJ. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction.New York: North Holland.
12.
RasmussenJ. (1988). Information technology: A challenge to the Human Factors Society?Human Factors Society Bulletin, 31(7), 1–3.
13.
RasmussenJ. (1990). The role of error in organizing behavior. Ergonomics, 33, 1185–1190.
14.
RasmussenJ. (1994). Market economy, management culture and accident causation: New research issues?Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Safety Science: Safety science for life, production, and the environment.Budapest: Meeting Budapest Organizer Ltd., pp. 191–208.
15.
RasmussenJ.BatstoneR. (1989). Why do complex organizational systems fail? Summary Proceedings of a Cross Disciplinary Workshop on “Safety Control and Risk Management.” Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
16.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error.New York: Cambridge U.
17.
SheenJusticeMr. (1987). MV Herald of Free Enterprise. Report of court no. 8074 formal investigation. London: Department of Transport.
18.
SheridanT. B. (1991). New realities of human factors. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 34(2), 1–3.
19.
WoodsD. D.JohannesenL. J.CookR. I.SarterN. B.Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight.Columbus, OH: Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Ohio State U., 1993.
