Intelligibility of Synthesized Voice Messages in Commercial Truck Cab Noise for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Abstract

A human factors experiment was conducted to assess the intelligibility of synthesized speech under a variety of noise conditions for both hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. Modified Rhyme Test stimuli were used to determine intelligibility in four speech-to-noise (S/N) ratios (0,5,10, and 15 dB), and three noise types, consisting of flat-by-octaves (pink) noise, interior noise of a currently produced heavy truck, and truck cab noise with added background speech. A quiet condition was also investigated. During recording of the truck noise for the experiment, in-cab noise measurements were obtained. According to OSHA standards, these data indicated that drivers of the sampled trucks have a minimal risk for noise-induced hearing loss due to in-cab noise exposure when driving at freeway speeds because noise levels were below 80 dBA. In the intelligibility experiment, subjects with hearing loss had significantly lower intelligibility than normal-hearing subjects, both in quiet and in noise, but no interaction with noise type or S/N ratio was found. Intelligibility was significantly lower for the noise with background speech than the other noises, but the truck noise produced intelligibility equal to the pink noise. An analytical prediction of intelligibility using Articulation Index calculations exhibited a high positive correlation with the empirically obtained intelligibility data for both groups of subjects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

S. M.

Alberti

P. W.

Haythornthwaite

Riko

(1982). Speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protectors. In Alberti

P. W.

(Ed.), Personal hearing protection in industry (pp. 371–385). New York: Raven.

Acton

W. I.

(1970). Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss. Ergonomics, 13 (5), 546–554.

ANSI S3.19-1974 (1974). Method for the measurement of real-ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of earmuffs. New York: American National Standards Institute.

ANSI S3.5-1969 r 1986 (1986). Method for calculation of the articulation index. New York: American National Standards Institute.

ANSI S3.2-1989 (1989). Method for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems. New York: American National Standards Institute.

Clarke

R. M.

(1978). Stationary locomotive in-cab noise measurements. Sound and Vibration, 12 (5), 18–23.

Hawkins

J. E.

Stevens

S. S.

(1950). The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22 (1), 6–13.

Kangas

K. A.

Allen

G. D.

(1990). Intelligibility of synthetic speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 751–755.

Leneman

(1977). Truck noise 9: Noise reduction study of an in-service diesel-powered truck (Report No. DOT-TSC-OST-76-3). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.

10.

Logan

J. S.

Greene

B. G.

Pisoni

D. B.

(1989). Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86 (2), 566–581.

11.

Nerbonne

M. A.

Accardi

A. E.

(1975). Noise-induced hearing loss in a truck driver population. The Journal of Auditory Research, 15, 119–122.

12.

OSHA (1989). Occupational noise exposure. In Code of Federal Regulations, 29 Part 1910.95, (pp. 177–194). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

13.

Pekkarinen

Salmivalli

Suonpää

(1990). Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those of normal hearing. Scandinavian Audiology, 19, 31–36.

14.

Pisoni

D. B.

Koen

(1982). Intelligibility of natural and synthetic speech at several different signal-to-noise ratios. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, UU1.

15.

Pollack

Pickett

J. M.

(1958). Masking of speech by noise at high sound levels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30 (2), 127–130.

16.

Pratt

R. L.

(1987). Quantifying the performance of text-to-speech synthesizers. Speech Technology, 5, 54–63.

17.

Reif

Z. F.

Moore

T. N.

(1983). Prediction of in-cab noise exposure of drivers (Technical Paper 831028). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

18.

Reif

Z. F.

Moore

T. N.

Steevensz

A. E.

(1980). Noise exposure of truck drivers (Technical Paper 800278). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

19.

Society of Automotive Engineers (1988). Sound level for truck cab interior (Report No. SAE J336). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.

20.

Smoorenburg

G. F.

de Laat

J. A. P. M.

Plomp

(1982). The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise. In Borchgrevink

H. M.

(Ed.), Hearing and Hearing Prophylaxis (Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement 16) (pp. 123–133).

21.

Werner

V. A.

Boyce

(1976). Truck noise 11: Evaluation and reduction of heavy-duty truck noise (Report No. DOT-TSC-OST-76-21). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.