This report introduces three core principles that define human factors science, and summarizes conceptual and empirical evidence in support of their validity. The principles are: (1) performance and design are interdependent; (2) the unit of analysis is the human-machine system; and (3) tailor design to the control capabilities of behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChapanisA. (1991, 1992). To communicate the human factors message, you have to know what the message is and how to communicate it. Human Factors Society bulletin, 34(11), 1–4 (Part 1); 35(1), 3–6 (Part 2).
2.
FlachJ.M. (1994). Ruminations on mind, matter, and what matters. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th annual meeting.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. In press.
3.
FlachJ.M.HancockP.A. (1992). An ecological approach to human-machine systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th annual meeting (pp. 1056–1058). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
4.
GouldJ.D. (1990). How to design usable systems. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 757–789). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5.
HornickR.J. (1987). Dreams, design and destiny. Human factors, 29(1), 111–121.
6.
MeisterD. (1994). Behavioral design of automated systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th annual meeting.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. In press.
7.
MerkenR.S. (1986). Human factors and human nature: Is psychological theory really necessary?Human Factors Society bulletin, 29(9), 1–2.
8.
MorayN. (1994). “De maximus non curat lex” or How context reduces science to art in the practice of human factors. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th annual meeting.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. In press.
9.
PoultonE.C. (1966). Engineering psychology. Annual review of psychology, 17, 177–200.
10.
SimonC.W. (1987). Will egg-sucking ever become a science?Human Factors Society bulletin, 30(6), 1–4.
11.
SmithK.U. (1972). Cybernetic psychology. In SingerR.N. (Ed.), The psychomotor domain (pp. 285–348). New York: Lea and Febiger.
12.
SmithK.U.SmithT.J. (1993). Human-computer interaction and the automation of work. In SmithM.SalvendyG. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: software and hardware interfaces (pp. 837–842). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13.
SmithK.U.SmithW.M. (1962). Perception and motion: an analysis of space-structured behavior.Philadelphia: Saunders.
14.
SmithT.J. (1993). The scientific basis of human factors - a behavioral cybernetic perspective. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th annual meeting (pp. 534–538). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
15.
SmithT.J.HenningR.A.SmithK.U. (1994). Sources of performance variability. In SalvendyG.KarwowskiW. (Eds.), Design of work and development of personnel in advanced manufacturing (pp. 273–330). New York: Wiley.
16.
SmithT.J.LarsonT.L. (1991). Integrating quality management and hazard management: a behavioral cybernetic perspective. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th annual meeting (pp. 903–907). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
17.
SmithT.J.SmithK.U. (1987). Feedback-control mechanisms of human behavior. In SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 251–293). New York: Wiley.
