Incidental Exposure to Rotating Warnings on Alcoholic Beverage Labels

Abstract

No previous research has been published specifically aimed at determining the effectiveness of rotating warnings (as is required in the government-mandated cigarette warnings). This issue has become relevant because decisions may be made with respect to rotating warnings in print and broadcast alcoholic beverage advertisements, and perhaps for labels and ads for other products as well. The present study used 80 participants in a controlled incidental-exposure laboratory experiment. The effect of the current government warning label for alcoholic beverages was compared to a 5-warning and a 10-warning rotating scheme as well as a no-warning control condition. The study was disguised as marketing research where participants were incidentally exposed to the warnings while evaluating a set of alcoholic beverage labels. The dependent measure was performance on a test of alcohol facts and hazards. Findings show that the present single government warning label is inadequate compared to multiple (rotated) warnings. The 10-warning condition produced higher test scores than either the single government warning or no-warning conditions. Overall, the 5-warning condition produced intermediate levels of knowledge. Also, four exposures produced greater specific warning content knowledge than either two or no exposures. The results suggest that rotating multiple warnings are a better means of communicating facts and hazards than a single repeated warning of limited content. Policy implications are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barlow

Wogalter

M.S.

(1993). Alcoholic beverage warnings in magazine and television advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 147–156.

Federal Register (1989). Implementation of the Alcoholic Beverage Labeling Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–690, 27 CFR Parts 4, 5, 7, and 16), Vol. 54, pp. 7160–7164. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Treasury.

Gardner-Bonneau

D. J.

Kabbara

Hwang

Bean

Gantt

Hartshorn

Howell

Spence

(1989). Cigarette Warnings: Recall of content as a function of gender, message context, smoking habits and time. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 928–930). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Kalsher

M. J.

Clarke

S. W.

Wogalter

M. S.

(1993). Evaluation of a warning placard for communicating alcohol facts and hazards. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 78–90.

Kennedy

J. P.

(1990). Sensible Advertising and Family Education Act. 102nd United States Congress HR 4493, Washington DC.

Laughery

K. R.

Young

S. L.

Vaubel

K. P.

Breisford

J. W.

(1993). The noticeability of warnings on alcoholic beverage. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12, 38–56.

Waldman

(1988). Do warning labels work? Newsweek, My 18, 40–41.

Wogalter

M. S.

Allison

S. T.

McKenna

N. A.

(1989). The effects of cost and social influence on warning compliance. Human Factors, 31, 133–140.

Wogalter

M. S.

Young

S. L.

(1992). Using warnings to increase safe behavior: A process model approach. In Guindon

(Ed.) Best's Safety Directory (Vol. 2, pp. 1604–1609). Oldwick, NJ: A. M. Best Company.

10.

Young

S. L.

(1991). Increasing the noticeability of warnings: Effects of pictorial, color, signal icon and border. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 580–584). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.