Advances in miniaturization and wireless communications are providing the computer industry with the impetus to design handheld, portable computer terminals. Until enough research and experience evolves from handheld terminals to build a literature on design factors and to develop design guidelines and standards that would provide starting points for product design, the human factors community must rely on its user-centered design approach of designing, prototyping, and testing to ensure a safe and usable form factor for such terminals. The methodology that was used in establishing the design criteria for such a terminal included literature research, focus groups with potential users, contextual field research, expert testimony, and primary laboratory research, including a grasp analysis and screen viewability, data entry, signature capture, and holsterability testing. The user-centered design process described here provided the information required to establish the basic design criteria that would assure user safety and task efficiency. It also revealed informational needs for the human factors community involved in the development of handheld computer terminals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldenD. G.DanielsR. W.KanarickA. F. (1972). Keyboard design and operation: A review of the major issues. Human Factors, 14 (4), 275–293.
2.
American National Standard for Human Factors Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations. (1988). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, Inc.
3.
BaileyR.W. (1989). Human Performance Engineering: Using Human Factors/Ergonomics to Achieve Computer System Usability. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BergV. J.ClayD. J.FathallahF. A.HigginbothamV. L. (1988). The effects of instruction on finger strength measurements: Applicability of the Caldwell region. In AghazadehF. (Ed.), Trends in ergonomics (pp. 191–198). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V..
5.
BeringerD. B. (1989). Touchpanel sampling strategies and keypad performance comparisons. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 71–75). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
6.
BolsingerP. P.MaiN. (1985). A microcomputer system for the measurement of finger forces. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 7, 51–55.
7.
ButterbaughL. C. (1982). Evaluation of alternative alphanumeric keying logics. Human Factors, 24 (5), 521–533.
8.
BuxtonW.HillR.RowleyP. (1985). Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. In BaekerR.BuxtonW. (Eds.), Readings in Human-Computer Interaction, a Multi-disciplinary Approach (pp. 376–385). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishing, Inc.
9.
BuxtonW. (1986). There's more to interaction than meets the eye. Some issues in manual input. In NormanD.DraperS (Eds.), User centered design (pp. 319–337). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
10.
CardS. K.MoranT. P.NewellA. P. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction. New Jersey: Erlbaum Associates.
11.
ClareC.R. (1970). Hur an factors in keyboard design. Computer hardware. California: Hewlett Packard Co.
12.
DavidsonL. (1966). A pushbutton telephone for alphanumeric input. Datamation, April, 27–30.
13.
GopherD.KimchiR. (1987). Perceptual and motor determinants of efficient data entry. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 71–75). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
14.
GilbertB. G.HahnH. A.GilmoreW. E.SchurmanD. L. (1988). Thumbs up: Anthropometry of the first digit. Human Factors, 30 (6), 747–750.
15.
GreensteinJ. S.ArnautL. Y. (1988). Input devices. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, (pp. 495–518). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
16.
HeuerH. (1985). Intermanual interactions during simultaneous execution and programming of finger movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17 (3), 335–354.
17.
KaratJ.McDonaldJ. E.AndersonM. (1986). A comparison of menu selection techniques: Touch panel, mouse and keyboard. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 25, 73–88.
18.
KoppaR. J. (1985). A study of data entry keyboards: the 4 × 4 keypad. (Tech. Note 4–85). Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
19.
KroemerK. H. E. (1987). Anthropometry (Table A.6). Industrial work physiology. Blacksburg, VA: Elsevier Science Publishers.
20.
LandauerT. K.NachbarD. W. (1985). Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width. Human Factors in Computer Systems Proceeding, San Francisco, CA.
21.
PaapK. R.Roske-HofstrandR. J. (1986). The optimal number of menu options per panel. Human Factors, 28 (4), 377–385.
22.
PaelkeG.M. (1993). A comparison of route guidance destination entry methods. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 569–573). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
23.
PickeringJ. A. (1986). Touch-sensitive screens: The technologies and their application. Int. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 25 (3), 249–269.
24.
PlaisantC.SearsA. (1992). Touchscreen interfaces for alphanumeric data entry. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 293–297).Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
25.
PotosnakK. M. (1988) Keys and keyboards. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, (pp. 475–495). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
26.
RumelhartD. E.NormanD. A. (1982). Simulating a skilled typist: A study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6, 1–36.
27.
SearsA.PlaisantK.ShneidermanB. (1990). A new era for touchscreen applications: high precision, dragging icons, and refined feedback (Tech. Draft Report). Maryland: University of Maryland, Human-Computer Interaction Laboratory.
28.
SilversteinB. A.FineL. J.ArmstrongT. J. (1987). Occupational factors and carpal tunnel syndrome. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 11, 343–358.
29.
SindP. M. (1990). The effects of structural and overlay design parameters of membrane switches on the force exerted by users. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 380–384). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
30.
SnyderH. L. (1988). Image quality. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, (pp. 437–474). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
31.
WiklundM. E.DumasJ. S.HoffmanL. R. (1987). Optimizing a portable terminal keyboard for combined one-handed and two-handed use. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 585–589). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
32.
WilligesR. C.WilligesB. H. (1982). Modeling the human operator in computer-based data entry. Human Factors, 24 (3), 285–299.
33.
YunM. H. (1993). A hand posture measurement system for evaluating manual too tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 754–758). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
34.
YunM. H.KotaniK.EllisD. (1992). Using force sensitive resistors to evaluate hand tool grip design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 806–810). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
35.
ZelaznikH.N.HahnR. (1985). Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: The precuing of hand, digit, and duration. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17 (2), 190–218.
