Abstract
Computerized operating procedures have been suggested as a mechanism for reducing human error in nuclear power plants. The Computerized Procedures Manual (COPMA-II) is an electronic procedure system that can be used to execute procedures, to track progress through plant procedures, and to automatically monitor plant parameters. To evaluate the effectiveness of COPMA-II, eight teams of two licensed reactor operators operated a scaled pressurized water reactor under normal and accident conditions, using both COPMA-II and traditional paper procedures. Error rates, times to initiate procedures, times to complete procedures, and subjective estimates of workload were collected for each scenario. The most interesting finding of the study was that, for one accident scenario, performance with COPMA-II was twice as accurate as performance with paper procedures. However, operators initiated responses to both accident scenarios fastest with paper procedures. Procedure type did not moderate time to complete procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
