Automation and Supervisory Control: A Perspective on Human Performance,Training,and Performance Aiding

Abstract

This paper is based on results from an on-going effort sponsored by the US Army Research Institute (ARI) concerned with human performance and training issues in automated, near-real-time air defense command and control systems. Air defense command and control is the specific applications context, but the paper's implications extend to many contemporary process control settings. Topics that are addressed in the paper include: (1) human performance problems associated with automation, (2) a new look at human performance requirements in near-real-time process control, (3) and training and job performance support requirements for supervisory controllers. The “new look” portion describes a reasonable and evolving concept for human participation in automated processing, designated Rule-Based Supervisory Control. The paper is intended to introduce these topics to concept developers, system designers, and trainers dealing with automated process control technology.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bainbridge

(1987). Ironies of automation. In Rasmussen

Duncan

Leplat

(Eds.), New technology and human error. New York: Wiley.

Gersh

J.R.

Hamill

B.W.

(1991). Cognitive engineering of rule-based supervisory control systems: Observations concerning users' task performance. In Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Charlottesville, VA: IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society.

Hamill

B.W.

Gersh

J.R.

(1991). Understanding rule-based supervisory control. In Proceedings of the 1991 Joint Directors of Laboratories Basic Research Group Symposium on Command and Control Research. Washington, DC: National Defense University.

Hamill

B.W.

Gersh

J.R.

(1992). Decision-making performance in rule-based supervisory control: Empirical development of a cognitive process model. In Proceedings of the 1992 Joint Directors of Laboratories Basic Research Group Symposium on Command and Control Research. Washington, DC: National Defense University.

Hopkin

V.D.

(1992). Human factors issues in air traffic control. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 35(6), 1–4.

Moray

(1990). Mental models of complex systems. In Moray

Ferrell

W.R.

Rouse

W.B.

(Eds.), Robotics, control, and society. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Rasmussen

(1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York: North Holland.

Rouse

W.B.

Cannon-Bowers

J.A.

Salas

(1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296–1308.

Sheridan

T.B.

(1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Wesson

R.B.

(1981). An alternative scenario for air traffic control: Shared control (Technical Report P-6703). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.