Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Warning labels are widely used to convey information about the safe use of products. In an attempt to design better warnings, researchers are exploring factors that influence their effectiveness. One design factor that appears promising is an interactive label that requires manipulation by the consumer using the product. In the present research, the effectiveness of two interactive warning labels (with and without a color component) were compared to a standard label in the context of a realistic product-use task. Additionally, task load was manipulated (low vs. higher). The results showed that the interactive labels were noticed, recalled and complied to more often than the standard on-product label. No effect of increasing task load and adding color to the interactive label was observed. The results indicate that the interactive label is a viable means of facilitating warning effectiveness.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bosinoff

(1981). A script theoretic approach to information processing: An energy conservation application, Advances in consumer research, 9, 481–486. St. Louis, MO: Association for Consumer Research.

Brewer

W. G.

Treyens

J. C.

(1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.

DeJoy

D. M.

(1989). Consumer product warnings: Review and analysis of effectiveness research. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 936–940). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Frantz

J. P.

Rhoades

T. P.

(in press). A task analytic approach to the temporal placement of product warnings. Human Factors.

Gill

R. T.

Barbera

Precht

(1987). A comparative evaluation of warning label designs. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 476–478). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Hunn

B. P.

Dingus

T. A.

(1992). Interactivity, information and compliance cost in a consumer product warning scenario. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24, 497–505.

Johnson-Laird

P. N.

(1983). Mental models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Lehto

M. R.

(1991). A proposed conceptual model of human behavior and its implication for design of warnings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 595–611.

Lehto

M. R.

Miller

J. M.

(1988). The effectiveness of warning labels. Journal of Products Liability 11, 215–210.

10.

Miller

J. M.

Lehto

M. R.

Frantz

J. P.

(1990). Instructions and Warnings: The Annotated Bibliography. Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical Publications.

11.

Schank

R. C.

Abelson

(1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Wickens

C. D.

(1989). Attention and skilled performance. In Holding

(ed.), Human skills (2nd ed., pp. 71–105). New York: Wiley.

13.

Wogalter

M. S.

Barlow

Murphy

S. A.

(1992). Accessory safety directives on electronic equipment increases compliance to safety warnings in an owner's manual. Poster presented at the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, Atlanta, October.

14.

Wogalter

M. S.

Godfrey

S. S.

Fontenelle

G. A.

Desaulniers

D. R.

Rothstein

P. R.

Laughery

K. R.

(1987). Effectiveness of warnings. Human Factors, 29, 599–612.

15.

Wogalter

M. S.

Young

S. L.

(in press). Enhancing warning compliance through alternative product label designs. Applied Ergonomics.

16.

Young

S. L.

(1991). Increasing the noticeability of warnings: Effects of pictorial, color, signal icon and border. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 580–584). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

The Effectiveness of an Interactive Warning in a Realistic Product-Use Situation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References