The “Right Stuff”: Personality Tests and the Five-Factor Model in Landing Craft Air Cushion Crew Training

Abstract

The purpose of our investigation was to determine if personality testing and a five-factor model could improve the selection of Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) vehicle operators. Vehicle operators for the LCAC are currently selected on the basis of their performance on a computer-based psychomotor selection system. The various psychomotor tests in the selection system have demonstrated predictive validity in LCAC crew training. Certain personality characteristics may also be involved in the LCAC vehicle operator training success. In fact, various researchers have found that personality testing may improve the selection of Navy/Marine Corps aviators. There is increasing evidence that a five-factor model may be useful in describing the personality characteristics involved in training success. We believe that a five-factor model may improve the selection system used for LCAC vehicle operators. A principal component analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to determine the underlying structure of the Adult Personality Inventory (API) with 168 LCAC crew candidates. The resulting factor scores were then entered into a series of hierarchical multiple regression analyses to determine the relation of the personality factor scores and the performance-based test to an underway grade in training criterion. The results indicated that one personality factor, openness, significantly improved predictions of the criterion (p < 0.05). Based on these results, we believe that personality testing may improve the selection of LCAC vehicle operators.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barrick

M. R.

Mount

M. K.

(1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 24, 349–354.

Davis

R. A.

(1989). Personality: Its use in selecting candidates for US Air Force undergraduate pilot training (AU-ARI-88-8). Maxwell Air Force Base, TX: Air University.

Day

D. V.

Silverman

S. B.

(1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25–36.

Digman

J. M.

(1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

Digman

J. M.

Takemoto-Chock

N. K.

(1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170.

Dolgin

D. L.

Street

D. R.

Nontasak

Blower

D. J.

Travis

(1992). Operational implementation of a validated personnel selection system for Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAC) vehicle operators. In Proceedings of the 13th Psychology in the Department of Defense Symposium pp. 66–70. Colorado Springs, CO: USAF Academy.

Fiske

D. W.

(1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 329–344.

Helmreich

R. L.

(1982). Pilot selection and training. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

10.

Helton

K. T.

Nontasak

Dolgin

D. L.

(1992). Landing Craft Air Cushion (LCAO crew selection system manual (NAMRL-Special Report 92–4). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

11.

Helton

K. T.

Street

D. R.

(1992). The five-factor personality model and naval aviation candidates (NAMRL-1379). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

12.

Hunter

J. E.

Hunter

R. F.

(1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98.

13.

John

O. P.

(1990). The “big five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality. In Pervin

L. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 66–100). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

14.

Kaiser

(1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Psychometrika, 20, 141–151.

15.

Krug

S. E.

(1984). The Adult Personality Inventory manual. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

16.

Krug

S. E.

(1985). Test Plus: A microcomputer-based system for the Adult Personality Inventory. Champaign, Illinois, Metritech, Inc.

17.

Marshall

G. N.

Wortman

C. B.

Vickers

R. R.

Kusulas

J. W.

Hervig

L. K.

(1991). Using the five-factor model of personality as a framework for guiding personality-health research (NHRC-91-36). San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center.

18.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin's circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595.

19.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1985). Updating Norman's “Adequate Taxonomy”: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 710–721.

20.

Norman

W. T.

(1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574–583.

21.

Pedersen

L. A.

Allan

K. E.

Laue

F. J.

Siem

(1992). Personality theory and construction in selection and classification (Tech. Report AL-TR-1992-0021). Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX: Armstrong Laboratory.

22.

Picano

J. J.

(1991). Personality types among experienced military pilots. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 62, 517–520.

23.

Siem

F. M.

(1990). Predictive validity of an automated personality inventory for Air Force pilot selection (Tech. Report AFHRL-TP-90-55). Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX: Human Resources Laboratory.

24.

Street

D. R.

Helton

K. T.

Dolgin

D. L.

(1992). The unique contribution of selected personality tests to the prediction of success in naval pilot training (NAMRL-1374). Pensacola, FL: Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.