Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Safety standards for consumer products can offer an important contribution to accident reduction. This paper describes how effective testing methods for safety requirements, which are part of a safety standard, may be developed.

In order to be effective, testing methods for the evaluation of products on aspects of safety must be valid, reproducible, and efficient. Various forms of testing methods are discussed with regard to their effectiveness.

The development of testing methods for trapping hazards, which can be applied to all kinds of products, is described in a case study. For this purpose, a number of accident scenarios have been drawn from data on trapping hazards. In each scenario a testing method is described, and criteria based on human factors data is added.

Accident scenarios have proved to be an extremely useful link between accident data and the simulation of performance on which a testing method can be based. Because human factors data is usually gathered for other purposes, implementation of this data in safety standards must be done with great caution.

We recommend the use of man-models in testing methods for optimal results. Furthermore, we recommend the verification of test conditions and criteria by user trials or panel tests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

DIN (1979). DIN 33402. Body Dimensions of People- Part 2: Values. Berlin: DIN.

CEN (1989). EN 71-1. Safety of Toys- Part 1: Mechanical and Physical Properties. Brussels: CEN.

CEN (1992). EN 294. Safety of Machinery: Safety Distances to Prevent Danger Zones Being Reached. Brussels: CEN.

Hoefnagels

W.A.M.

van Aken

(1991). Safety Criteria for Trapping Hazards. Report 108. Amsterdam: Consumer Safety Institute.

ISO (1989), ISO 8317. Child-resistant Packaging - Requirements for Reclosable Packages. Geneva: ISO.

ISO (1990). Guide 51 - Guidelines for the Inclusion of Safety Aspects in Standards. Geneva: ISO.

Ratté

D.J.

Morrison

M.L

Lerner

N.D.

Denham

S.A.

Johnson

McNeely D.

(1990). Development of Human Factors Criteria for Playground Equipment Safety. Silver Spring, MD, USA: COMSIS.

Schneider

L.W.

, e.a. (1986). Size and Shape of the Head and Neck from Birth to Four Years. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.

Snyder

R.G.

, e.a. (1977). Anthropometry of Infants, Children and Youth to Age 18 for Product Safety Design. Warrendale, USA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

10.

Steenbekkers

L.P.A.

(1989). Ergonomische gegevens voor kinderveiligheid (Ergonomic Data for Child Safety). Delft: Delft University of Technology.

11.

Thompson

(1989). Reach distance and Safety Standards. Ergonomics, vol 32, nr 9, 1061–1076.

12.

Weegels

M.F.

Kanis

(1990). Research into Accidents as a Design Tool. Ergonomics, vol 33, nr 4, 439–445.

13.

Wilson

J.R.

Norris

B.J.

(1992). Knowledge Transfer: Scattered Sources to Sceptical Users. Submitted to Ergonomics..

Test Methods in Safety Standards - Application of Human Factors Data -

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References