Individual Differences and Driver Response to Highway Intersections

Abstract

Along the Nation's roadways one of the most dangerous environments is the intersection. Accident investigations suggest several individual driver characteristics that may be associated with increased risk at intersections. To analyze the relationships of a number of driver characteristics to driver behavior in a controlled setting a laboratory simulation of the roadway intersection was created. Seventy-two research participants, ranging in age from 18 to 74, were measured on a battery of performance tests, administered questionnaires related to health and driving history, and exposed to a video display of approaching intersections as driver responses were measured. Each participant viewed 14 intersections containing a variety of traffic control devices. During the driving simulation portion of the research workload was assessed using six variables chosen to reflect three response modes-performance, subjective, and physiological. A MANOVA conducted to analyze the 3 (age level) by 2 (gender) factorial design indicated a main effect for both age and gender, based on three of the dependent variables-pedal response errors, speed of response, and heart rate reactivity. The responses to the intersection simulation indicated greater workloads for older drivers and female drivers. In a second phase of the data analysis stepwise multiple regressions were used to determine which independent variables, from among a set of driver characteristics, functioned as the best predictors of these performance decrements. As expected from the earlier MANOVA and univariate tests, age accounted for more variance in driver response than any single information processing variable. However, information processing variables that were most predictive of performance decrements included: field dependency, visual acuity, and depth perception.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ball

Owsley

(1991). Identifying correlates of accident involvement for the older driver. Human Factors, 33, 583–595.

Grubb

M. G.

(1986). Driver behavior at intersections: An analysis of accident related variables. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, 30, 251–255.

Harrington

D. M.

McBride

R. S.

(1970). Traffic violations by type, age, sex, and marital status. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2, 67–79.

McFarland

R. A.

Tune

G. S.

Welford

A. T.

(1964). On the driving of automobiles by older people. Journal of Gerontology, 19, 190–197.

Panek

P. E.

Barrett

G. V.

Sterns

H. L.

Alexander

R. A.

(1977). A review of age changes in perceptual information processing ability with regard to driving. Experimental Aging Research, 3, 387–449.

Petrocine

W. J.

(1979). Driving: Age 65 and older. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 32, 16–22.

Polus

(1985). Driver behavior and accident records at unsignalized urban intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 17, 25–32.

Spielberger

C. D.

(1883). Manual for the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory: Form Y. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Waller

P. F.

(1991). The older driver. Human Factors, 33, 499–505.

10.

Williams

A. F.

(1985). Nighttime driving and fatal crash involvement of teenagers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 17, 1–5.

11.

Witkin

H. A.

Oltman

P. K.

Raskin

Karp

S. A.

(1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

12.

Yanik

A. J.

(1985). What accident data reveal about elderly drivers (SAE Technical Paper Series No. 851688). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.