Threshold luminance contrast for letter recognition is dependent upon the amount of color contrast present, the background luminance, letter size, the age of the observer, and level of glare. Mathematical descriptions of these relationships are presented, and a model of contrast sensitivity composed of these functions is proposed. Limitations of the model, initial tests of its validity, and potential applications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackwellH.R. (1959). Specification of interior illumination levels. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, June, 317–353.
2.
BlackwellO.M.BlackwellH.R. (1971). Visual performance data for 156 normal observers of various ages. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, October, 3–13.
3.
BlackwellO.M.BlackwellH.R. (1980). Individual responses to lighting parameters for a population of 235 observers of varying ages. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, July, 205–232.
4.
BoyntonR.M.RinalducciE.J.SternheimC. (1969). Visibility losses produced by transient adaptational changes in the range from 0.4 to 4000 footlamberts. Illuminating Engineering, 217–227.
5.
FarberE.MatleC. (1989). PCDETECT: A revised version of the DETECT seeing distance model, Transportation Research Record1213, 1198–20.
6.
FryG.A. (1954). A re-evaluation of the scattering theory of glare, Illuminating Engineering, 49, 98–102.
7.
GinsburgA.P. (1978). Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data (AAMRL Report No. TR-78–12(). Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio: AMRL. (NTIS No. AD-A090117).
8.
HolladayL.L. (1927). Action of a light source in the field of view in lower visibility. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 14, 1.
9.
LeggeG.E.RubinG.S.LuebkerA. (1987). Psychophysics of reading – V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Research, 27, 1165–1177.
10.
PostD.L.SnyderH.L. (1986). Color Contrast Metrics for Complex Images (Report no. HPL-ONR 86–2). Arlington, Va: Office of Naval Research. (NTIS Publication No. AD-A174 960).
11.
PoynterD. (1988). The Effects of aging on perception of visual displays. SAE Transactions, vol. 97, 881754 (SP-762).
12.
PoynterD. (1990). Photometric guidelines for instrument panel displays. OS-158.Warren, Michigan: General Motors Research Laboratories.
13.
PoynterD. (1990). A PC-based program for calculating legibility of visual displays. RM 30–54.Warren, Michigan: General Motors Research Laboratories.
14.
Schmidt-ClausenH.J.BindelsJ.Th.H. (1974). Assessment of discomfort glare in motor vehicle lighting. Lighting Research and Technology6, 79–88.
15.
SnyderH.L.LynchE.F.AbernathyC.N.GreenJ.M.HelanderM.G.HirshR.S.HuntS.R.KorellD.D.KroemerK.H.E.MurchG.M.PalaciosN.P.PalermoS.A.RinalducciE.J.RuppB.A.SmithW.WagnerG.N.WilliamsR.D.ZwahlenH.T. (1988). American National Standard for Human Factors Engineering of Visual Display Terminal Workstations.The Human Factors Society Inc, Santa Monica, Ca. ANSI/HFS 100–188.
16.
StilesW.S. (1929). The effect of glare on the brightness difference threshold. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 104B, 322.
17.
TansleyB.W.BoyntonR.M. (1976). A line, not a space, represents visual distinctness of borders formed by different colors. Science, 191, 954–957.
18.
ValbergA.TansleyB.W. (1977). Tritanopic purity-difference function to describe the properties of minimally distinct borders. J. Opt. Soc. Am., 67(10), 1330–1336.
