Different types of knowledge (experimental, empirical, and experiential) combine with assumptions, beliefs, models, and theories to determine what Human Factors (HF) researchers and practitioners study and do. In research, problems of epistemology and meaning arise because one must interpret the meaning of effects produced in a study. In design, epistemology underlies the relationship between behavioral design variables and their anticipated performance effects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MarshallC.Ergonomics is dead, long live ergonomics. Human Factors Society Bulletin, March, 1991, 4–6, April 1991, 3–4.
2.
MeisterD.Conceptual Aspects of Human Factors.Baltimore: the Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
3.
MeisterD.An alternative measurement paradigm. In, Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1990, 1243–1247.
4.
RamseyH.R.AtwoodM.E.Human factors in computer systems: A review of the literature. Report SAI-79–111-DEN. Englewood, CO: Science Applications, 1979.
5.
ReasonJ.Human Error.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, in press.
6.
WilligesB.H.WilligesR.C.Dialogue design considerations for interactive computer systems. In. MucklerF. (Ed.), Human Factors Review, 1984. Santa Monica, CA: The Human Factors Society, 167–208.
