This presentation summarizes research conducted to identify and evaluate the features of a designed environment that contribute to habitability. Habitability is defined and discussed in terms of 13 dimensions relevant to conditions in which human crew live and work in isolation and confinement. Design suggestions are presented to enhance human performance and productivity, and a research program is described that has led to significant habitability improvements in isolated and confined military environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GundersonE.K.E. (1973). Psychological studies in Antarctica. In GundersonE.K.E. (Ed.) Human adaptability to Antarctic conditions. Antarctic Research Series Volume 22, American Geophysical Union, 115–131.
2.
GundersonE.K.E. (1963). Emotional symptoms in extremely isolated groups. Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 362–368.
3.
McCrobieD. (1989). Human factors design considerations for military trains. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting, (pp 536–540). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
4.
McGuireF.TolekinS. (1961). Group adjustment at the South Pole. Journal of Mental Science, 107, 954–960.
5.
MullinC.S.ConneryH.J. (1959). Psychological studies of an Antarctic IGY station. US Armed Forces Medical Journal, 10, 290–296.
6.
NardiniJ.E.HermannR.S.RasmussenJ.E. (1962). Navy psychiatric assessment in the Antarctic. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 97–105.
7.
PalinkasL.A. (1987a). Group adaptation and individual adjustment in Antarctica: A summary of recent research (Naval Health Research Center Report Number 87–24). San Diego, CA.
8.
PalinkasL.A. (1987b). Antarctica as a model for the human exploration of Mars, (Naval Health Research Center Report Number 87–16). San Diego, CA.
9.
RorherJ.H. (1961). Interpersonal relationships in isolated small groups. In FlahertyB.E. (Ed.), Psychophysiological aspects of space flight.New York: Columbia University Press.
10.
SellsS.B. (1962). Military small crew performance under isolation and stress. Critical review: Selection, indoctrination, and training for Arctic remote duty.Fort Wainwright, Alaska: Arctic Aeromedical Laboratory.
11.
SerxnerJ.L. (1968). An experience in submarine psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 25–30.
12.
SmithW.M. (1961). Scientific personnel in Antarctica: Their recruitment, selection and performance. Psychological Reports, 9, 163–182.
13.
SmithW.M. (1966). Observations over the lifetime of a small isolated group: Structure, danger, boredom, and vision. Psychological Reports, 19, 475–514.
14.
SmithW.M.JonesM.B. (1962). Astronauts, Antarctic scientists, and personal autonomy. Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 33, 162–166.
15.
StusterJ.W. (1986). Space station habitability recommendations based on a systematic comparative analysis of analogous conditions, (NASA Contractor Report 3943, Ames Research Center Contract NAS2-11690). Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.
16.
WeybrewB.B. (1957). Psychological and psychophysiological effects of long periods of submergence: Analysis of data collected during a 265–hour completely submerged, habit-ability cruise made by the USS Nautilus.New London, Connecticut: US Naval Medical Research Laboratory.
17.
WrightM.W.ChylinskiJ.SislerG.G.QuarringtonB. (1967). Personality factors in the selection of civilians for isolated northern stations. Canadian Psychologist, 8a, 23–31.
18.
ZubekJ.P. (1973). Review of effects of prolonged deprivation. In RasmussenJ.E. (Ed.), Man in isolation and confinement.Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
