The goals of this research were to investigate how well 20 camera symbols communicated their intended meanings, and to determine the common characteristics of well-understood symbols which could be incorporated into other symbols. Overall, one can conclude that the best symbols did indeed have similar characteristics. These characteristics were grouped into seven fundamental factors which should be considered when designing symbols.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Institute of Graphic Arts (1974). Symbol Signs, U.S. Department of Transportation, DOT-OS-40192.
2.
American National Standards Institute (1987). Draft Proposed American National Standard PH3.624..
3.
CahillM. (1975). Interpretability of graphic symbols as a function of context and experience factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 376–380.
4.
CahillM. (1976). Design features of graphic symbols varying in interpretability. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 42, 647–653.
5.
CristB. (1988). An Indexed Catalog of Symbols for Photographic and Other Imaging Equipment. Internal report PPG Human Factors, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY.
6.
DewarR.EllsJ. (1984). Methods of evaluation of traffic signs. Chapter 4 in Information Design: The Design of Signs and Printed Material.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
EasterbyR.S. (1970). The perception of symbols for machine displays. Ergonomics, 13, 149–158.
8.
EasterbyR.S.ZwagaH. (1984). Developing effective symbols. Chapter 15 in Information design: the design of signs and printed material.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
GreenP.PewR. (1978). Evaluating pictographic symbols: An automotive application. Human Factors, 20, 103–114.
10.
Japan Machinery Design Center (1983). Graphic Symbols for Camera Operation and Function Display..
11.
KolersP.A. (1969). Some formal characteristics of pictograms. American Scientist, 3, 348–363.
12.
MarcelA.BarnardP. (1979). Paragraphs of pictographs: The use of non-verbal instructions of equipment. In Processing of visible language. Vol. 1, KolersP.A.WrolstadM.E.BoremaH. (eds.), New York: Plenum.
13.
SzlichcinskiK.P. (1977). Symbols and pictograms: a review of their usefulness and the methodology of their design. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, Harlow, England: STL Ltd.
14.
WelfordA.T. (1984). Theory and Application in Visual Displays. Chapter 1 in Information Design: The Design of Signs and Printed Material.New York: John Wiley & Sons.
