Effects of Display Failures and Symbol Rotation on Visual Search Using Dot-Matrix Symbols

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of display failures and rotation of dot-matrix symbols on visual search performance. The type of display failure (cell, horizontal line, vertical line), failure mode (ON, failures matched the symbols; OFF, failures matched the background), percentage of failures (0, 1, 2, 3, 4%), and rotation angle (0, 70, 105 degrees) were the variables examined. Results showed that displays which exhibit ON cell failures greater than 1% significantly affect search time performance. Cell failures degrade performance more than line failures. Search time and accuracy were best when symbols were oriented upright. The effects of display failures and rotation angle were found to be independent. Implications for display design and suggestions for quantifying the distortion due to rotation are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

S. R.

Snyder

H. L.

(1984). Operator performance on flat-panel displays with line and cell failures (Tech. Report HFL-83–3). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Human Factors Laboratory.

Beaton

R. J.

Knox

S. T.

(1987). Flat-panel image quality. Society For Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XVIII, 115–117.

Cooper

L. A.

(1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20–43.

Cooper

L A.

Shepard

R. N.

(1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In Chase

W. G.

(Ed.), Visual information processing: proceedings (pp. 75–176). New York: Academic Press.

Corballis

M. C.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

Shetzer

L. I.

Butler

P. B.

(1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory and Cognition, 14, 27–38.

Crow

F. C.

(1978). The use of grayscale for improved raster display of vectors and characters. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, 78, (pp. 229–233).

Decker

J. J.

Kelly

P. L.

Pigion

R. G.

Kurokawa

Snyder

H. L.

(1988). The effects of character size, modulation, contrast, and font on contextual and random search performance in matrix-addressable displays. (Tech. Report). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Human Factors Engineering Laboratory.

Decker

J. J.

Pigion

R. G.

Snyder

H.L.

(1987). A literature review and experimental plan for research on the display of information on matrix-addressable displays. (Tech Memorandum 4–87). U. S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

Eley

M. G.

(1982). Identifying rotated letter-like symbols. Memory and Cognition, 10, 25–32.

10.

Koriat

Norman

(1985). Mental rotation and visual familiarity. Perception and Psychophysics, 37, 429–439.

11.

Lloyd

C. J. C.

Decker

J. J.

Kurokawa

Snyder

H. L.

(1988). Effects of line and cell failures on reading and search performance using matrix-addressable displays. Society For Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XIX, 344–347.

12.

Maddox

M. E.

(1980). Two-dimensional spatial frequency content and confusions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061.

13.

Pastor

J. R.

Uphaus

J. S.

(1982). Significant reading failures in 7−9 dot-matrix ASCII numerals with two percent dot loss. Society for Information Display International Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, XIII, 198–199.

14.

Riley

T. M.

Barbato

G. J.

(1978). Dot-matrix alphanumerics viewed under discrete element degradation. Human Factors, 20, 473–479.

15.

Vanderkolk

(1976). Dot matrix symbology. In Peters

G. L.

Riley

T. M.

(Eds.), Human Factors of dot-matrix displays (Tech. Report AFFDL-TR-75-48)(pp. 3–24). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Flight Dynamics Laboratory.