The term “direct” has been used quite liberally in recent discussions of human performance and human-machine systems. Shneiderman (1983) discusses “direct manipulation”; Hutchins, Hollan and Norman (1986) discuss “direct engagement”; and Gibson (1979) discusses “direct perception”. This paper will compare these different uses of the term direct and will examine the implications for interface design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GibsonJ. J. (1970), The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
2.
HutchinsE. L.HollanJ. D.NormalD. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In NormanD. A.DraperS. W. (Eds.), User Centered System Design, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
MarkL. S. (1987). Eyheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. JEP: HPP, 13, 361–370.
4.
RasmussenJ. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction. New York; North Holland.
5.
SyhneidermanB. (1983). Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages, IEEE Computer, 16(8), 57–69.
6.
WarrenW. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. JEP: HPP, 10, 683–703.
7.
WarrenW. H.WhangS. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. JEP: HPP, 13, 371–383.
