A Threshold Model of Visual Search

Abstract

A new model of visual search is proposed. It is suggested that in searching for a target among distractors, there is some threshold level of similarity between the target and the distractors. When the similarity of the target to a given distractor is below this threshold the distractor can be quickly rejected. When the distractor is above the threshold level of similarity it will take additional time to reject the distractor.

Several models of visual search, including threshold and non-threshold models, are simulated on a computer and compared to the results obtained by Geiselman, Landee & Christen (1982) in a visual search task. A threshold search model in which the time to reject distractors over the similarity threshold is a function of the increment above the threshold (where similarity is defined as proposed in Workman & Fisher, 1987), is shown to provide the best fit to the data. Implications for the selection of symbols for graphic displays are briefly discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Geiselman

R. E.

Landee

B. H.

Christen

F.G.

(1982). Perceptual discriminibility as a basis for selecting graphic symbols. Human Factors, 329–338.

Schneider

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychology Review. 84(1), 1–66.

Smith

S. L.

Thomas

D. W.

(1963). Display color coding compared with three shape codes for a class counting task. MITRE tech. ser. rep. No., No. 12.

Smith

S. L.

Thomas

D. W.

(1964). Color versus shape coding in information displays. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48 (3), 137–146.

Treisman

A. M.

Gelade

(1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

Workman

Fisher

D. L.

(1987). Selection of visual display symbology: A new metric of similarity. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31'st Annual Meeting, Santa Monica: The Human Factors Society, 510–513.