Relationship of Strength and Precision in Shooting Activities

Abstract

Reported is an experiment which was designed to (1) test the strength-precision relationship of grip and shoulder strength with competitive pistol shooting scores using a nationally ranked collegiate pistol team and (2) determine the effects of a very brief, specifically focused, intense grip and shoulder strength training program (10 min, 3 times per week for 8 weeks) on strength and shooting performance. All members of the Pennsylvania State University Navy ROTC Pistol Team (n = 12) were divided into two matched groups according to pre-test shooting scores. Both groups received identical shooting instruction and practice, but the training group participated in an eight-week strength development program while the control group did not. Maximum isometric strength (peak and 4-sec average force) measures were obtained from electronic output of a hand dynamometer and strain gauge (deltoid contraction from a lateral horizontal shooting position against an arm cuff). Shooting scores (slow fire, timed fire, rapid fire, and total) were used as performance measures.

The 24 intense but brief exercise bouts did not produce group training effects, despite painstaking efforts to use (1) exercises documented to produce training effects, (2) subjects who were highly motivated, (3) accurate and reliable strength testing equipment, and (4) a program which exercised to fatigue each day the target muscles. This finding is particularly alarming because of the strong body of literature suggesting the effect should have occurred. It also suggest that the time spent in strength training might better be spent in shooting. Nonetheless, robust strength-performance correlations were obtained, particularly in two areas: (1) slow fire shooting scores with grip strength and (2) timed and rapid fire with deltoid strength. Furthermore, individual subject analysis revealed that those that improved in strength also improved in shooting skill. This training was effective for improving strength and scores in some subjects, especially in producing increases in deltoid strength concomitant with improvements in timed and rapid fire scores. This work has implications for all types of free-limb shooting activities, for military and civilian populations, and for novice and elite performers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger

R.A.

Hardage

(1967). Effect of maximum loads for each of ten repetitions on strength improvement. Research Quarterly, 38, 715–722.

Christina

R.W.

Vercruyssen

(1983). The relationship between strength and pistol shooting performance. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 8(4), 197.

Christina

R.W.

Vercruyssen

Muller

(1983). A preliminary investigation of the effect of a strength training program on pistol shooting performance. Final research report for the National Rifle Association Grant-In-Aid Program. Motor Behavior Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.

Clarke

D.H.

(1973). Adaptations in strength and muscular endurance resulting from exercise. In Wilmore

J.H.

(Ed.), Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 1, 73–102.

Clarke

H.H.

(1973). Toward a better understanding of muscular strength. Physical Fitness Research Digest, 3, 1–20.

Clarke

H.H.

(1974a). Strength development and motor-sports improvement. In Clarke

H.H.

(Ed.), Physical Fitness Digest, 4(4).

Clarke

H.H.

(1974b). Development of muscular strength and endurance. In Clarke

H.H.

(Ed.), Physical Fitness Digest, 4(1).

Delorme

T.L.

Watkins

A.L.

(1948). Technics of progressive resistance exercise. Archives of Physio Med & Rehabilitation, 29, 263–73.

Fleishman

E.A.

(1964). The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

10.

Fox

E.L.

Mathews

D.K.

(1981). The physiological basis of physical education and athletics (3rd edition). New York: Sanders College Publishing.

11.

Ishiko

(1974). The organism and muscular work. In Larson

L.A.

(Ed.), Fitness, health, and work capacity. New York: Macmillan.

12.

Kroll

(1962). Reliability of selective measures of human strength. Research Quarterly, 33, 410–17.

13.

Kroll

(1963a). Reliability variations in test-retest situations. Research Quarterly, 34, 50–55.

14.

Kroll

(1963b). A reliable method of assessing isometric strength. Research Quarterly, 34, 350–55.

15.

Kroll

(1966). Levels of isometric strength and isometric endurance in repeated contractions. Research Quarterly, 37, 375–383.

16.

Landers

D.M.

Christina

R.W.

Hatfield

Daniels

Doyle

(1980). Moving competitive shooting into the scientist's lab. American Rifleman, Apr, 36–7, 76–7.

17.

McCraw

L.W.

(1964). Effects of variation of forearm position in elbow flexion. Research Quarterly, 35, 504–510.

18.

Montoye

H.J.

Faulkner

J.A.

(1964). Determination of optimum setting of an adjustable grip dynamometer. Research Quarterly, 35, 29–36.

19.

Morehouse

C.A.

(1967). Development and maintenanc of isometric strength and subjects with diverse initial strengths. Research Quarterly, 38, 449–456.

20.

Shaver

L.G.

(1971). Maximum isometric strength and relative muscular endurance gains and their relationships. Research Quarterly, 42, 194–202.

21.

Thistle

H.G.

Hislop

H.J.

Mofroid

Lowman

M.W.

(1967). Isokinetic contraction: A new concept of resistance exercise. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 48, 279–282.

22.

Wright

(1959). Factors influencing diurnal variations of strength of grip. Research Quarterly, 30, 110–116.