In a review of flight simulation performance experiments conducted at the U.S. Navy's Visual Technology Research simulator (VTRS), it was observed that individual difference variables accounted for a major portion of the total explained variance, in many cases more than the simulator equipment variables that were deliberately manipulated. This finding underscores the importance of individual differences in performance and training research in support of man-machine systems development and implementation. The identification of the substrates underlying individual differences will impact on equipment design considerations and training program requirements for military and industrial systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrauneR.WickensC. D. (1986). Time-sharing revisited: Test of a componential model for the assessment of individual differences. Ergonomics, 29, 1399–1414.
2.
DillonR. F. (Ed.). (1985). Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
3.
DillonR. F.SchmeckR. R. (Eds.). (1983). Individual differences in cognition (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
4.
HaysW. (1977). Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
5.
HoganJ.ArnesonS.SalasE. (1987). Individual differences in military training environments: Four areas of research (NAVTRASYSCEN TR87-003). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
6.
JonesM. B.KennedyR. S.TurnageJ. J.KuntzL. A.JonesS. A. (1985). Meta-analysis of human factors engineering studies comparing individual differences, practice effects and equipment design variations (Final Report for Contract F33615-85-C-0539). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Air Force Systems Command, Aeronautical Systems Div/PMRSB.
7.
KennedyR. S.BerbaumK. E.CollyerS. C.MayJ. G.DunlapW. P. (1988). Spatial requirements for visual simulation of aircraft at real-world distances. Human Factors, 30, 153–161.
8.
KiddJ. S.ShellyM. W.JeantheauG.FittsP. M. (1958). The effect of enroute flow control on terminal system performance: A study in human engineering aspects of radar air traffic control (TR 57–663). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air Development Center.
9.
LinternG.KennedyR. S. (1984). Video games as a covariate for carrier landing research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 167–172.
10.
ParsonH. M. (1972). Man-machine system experiments. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
11.
WestraD. P. (1983). Simulator design features for air-to-ground bombing. I. Performance experiment I. (NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 81-C-0105-4). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Equipment Center.
12.
WestraD. P.LinternG. (1985). Simulator design features for helicopter landing on small ships. I. A performance Study (NAVTRASYSCEN 81-C-0105-13). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
13.
WestraD. P.SimonC. W.CollyerS. C.ChambersW. S. (1982). Simulator design features for carrier landings: I. Performance experiments (NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 78-C-0060-7). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Equipment Center.
