Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the use of control panels for the automotive industry, consistency and usability are of major importance. General qualitative guidelines exist for the designer, but there is currently a lack of quantitative human factors data for control panel designs. A state of the art design tool which provides the designer with ergonomic usability guidelines and structure is needed. As part of the current research, a computer-based tool which provides a quantitative analysis of the ergonomic quality of a control panel layout has been created. This tool is a tailored Auto-CAD¹ program for the IBM PC² which provides features to encourage consistency and structure in the design of control panel layouts. Extending the work by Tullis (1983) on alphanumeric display metrics, four graphical metrics for the overall and functional design levels are included as part of the design tool. These metrics are: 1) Overall Density - ratio of free space to occupied space, 2) Local Density - how closely placed the design entities are to each other, 3) Layout Complexity - position irregularity of functional areas, and 4) Display Grouping - number of functions and number of controls and displays. In this effort, the design metrics and the design tool have been developed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaranson

Sharits

Sharp

Ancona

(1985). Target detection as a function of color-coding and field density. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 1066–1069). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors Society.

Bailey

R. W.

(1982). Human Performance Engineering: A Guide for System Designers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Bonney

M. C.

Williams

R. W.

(1977). CAPABLE: A computer program to layout controls and panels. Ergonomics, 20, 3, 297–316.

Bonsiepe

(1968). A method of quantifying order in typographic design. Journal of Typographic Research, 2, 203–220.

Kochhar

D. S.

(in press). Status displays in automated assembly. Applied Ergonomics.

Mann

T. L.

Schnetzler

L. A.

(1986). Evaluation of formats for aircraft control/display units. Applied Ergonomics, 17, 4, 265–270.

McCormick

E. J.

Sanders

M. S.

(1982). Human Factors in Engineering and Design. (5th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Muckler

F. A.

(1984). Standards for the design of controls: A case history. Applied Ergonomics, 15, 3, 175–178.

Pulat

B. M.

Ayoub

M. A.

(1985). A computer-aided panel layout procedure for process control jobs - LAYGEN. IEEE Transactions, 17, 1, 84–93.

10.

Tullis

T. S.

(1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors, 25, 657–682.

11.

Tullis

T. S.

(1984). Predicting the usability of alphanumeric displays. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rice University, Houston, Texas.

12.

VanCott

H. P.

Kinkade

R. G.

(Eds.). (1972) Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design. (rev. ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Wilson

D. L.

Burns

R. K.

Kuperman

G. G.

(1985). Feature positive coding effects on object localization. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 1066–1069). Baltimore, MD: Human Factors Society.

Evaluation Metrics and a Tool for Control Panel Design

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References