This paper examines the generalizability of participatory ergonomics to different cultures. Studies using participatory strategies to introduce ergonomic solutions are reviewed across three distinct cultures. The results lead us to believe that these effects are sufficiently robust and not culture or method bound. Four lessons can be learned from these participatory interventions: 1) Interventions should build on local customs; 2) Solutions should be practical and understandable to the participating end-users; 3) Culture should be used as a resource for solving design and cross-cultural problems; and 4) Synergy between the culture and the intervention will enhance the success and magnify problems of the intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC. (1957). Personality and organization.Harper & Roe: New York.
2.
ChildJ.D. (1981). Culture, contingency and capitalism in the cross-national study of organizations. In CummingsL.L.ShawB.M. (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol III. JAI Publisher: Greenwich, CT, pp; 303–356.
3.
DrayS.M. (1986). The new “internationalism” in macroergonomics. In BrownO.HendrickH. W. (Eds.) Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management-II.North Holland: Amsterdam, 499–503.
4.
ImadaA.S. (1985). Integrating participatory ergonomics into an organizational culture: A macroergonomic approach. Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Vol. II, Baltimore, MD, 866–869.
5.
ImadaA.S. (1986a). Is participatory ergonomics appropriate across cultures? Trends and future criteria. Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Vol. II, Dayton, OH, 1107–1109.
6.
ImadaA.S.NoroK.NagamachiM. (1986). Participatory ergonomics: Methods for improving individual and organizational effectiveness. In BrownO.Jr.HendrickH.W. (Eds.) Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management-II.North-Holland: Amsterdam, pp; 403–406.
7.
KogiK. (1985a). Participatory approach in applying ergonomics for workplace improvement in developing countries. In BrownI. D.GoldsmithR.CoombesK.SinclairM.A. (Eds.) Ergonomics 85.Taylor & Francis: London, 370–372.
8.
KogiK. (1985b). Improving working conditions in small enterprises in developing Asia.ILO: Geneva.
9.
LawlerE.E.III (1986). High-involvement management.Jossey Bass: San Francisco.
10.
LawlerE.E.IIIRenwickP.A.BullockR.J. (1981). Employee influence on decisions: An analysis. Journal of Occupational Behavior.2, 115–123.
11.
LikertR. (1961). New patterns of management.McGraw-Hill: New York.
12.
MarksM.L.MirvisP.H.HackettE.J.GradyJ.F. (1986). Employee participation in a quality circle program: Impact on quality of work life, productivity, and absenteeism. Journal of Applied Psychology.71, 61–69.
13.
McGregorD. (1960). The human side of enterprise.McGraw-Hill: New York.
14.
NagamachiM. (in press). Application of participatory ergonomics through quality circle activities. In ImadaA.S.NoroK. (Eds.) Participatory Ergonomics.Taylor & Francis: London.
15.
NoroK. (1985). Need for participative approach of ergonomics and company-wide ergonomic activities. In BrownI. D.GoldsmithR.CoombesK.SinclairM.A. (Eds.) Ergonomics 85.Taylor & Francis: London, 370–372.
16.
NoroK. (in press). VDT work guidelines developed by people in the workplace. In ImadaA.S.NoroK. (Eds.) Participatory Ergonomics.Taylor & Francis.
17.
NoroK.ImadaA.S. (1984). Participatory ergonomics. A workshop presented at the First International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management, Honolulu, HI.
18.
NoroK.KogiK.ImadaA.S. (1986). The current state of participatory ergonomics in the world. Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 22, April 208–209 (in Japanese).
19.
ZinkK.J. (in press). Participatory ergonomics–Some developments and examples from West Germany. In ImadaA.S.NoroK. (Eds.) Participatory Ergonomics.Taylor & Francis: London.
