A study was conducted to examine learning and performance differences between a command language and a direct manipulation system. Experimental results point out large differences in performance between the command language and direct manipulation systems which favor direct manipulation. Formal models of the knowledge required to use the systems were developed following the framework suggested by Kieras and Polson (1985). Failure of the formal models to accurately predict the advantages for the direct manipulation system are traced to insufficient emphasis on error behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CardS.K.MoranT.P.NewellA. (1983). The Psychology of Human Computer Interaction. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
KierasD.E.PolsonP.G. (1985). An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, 365–394.
3.
NewellA.CardS.K. (1985). The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 1,. 209–242.
4.
PolsonP.G.KierasD.E. (1985). A quantitative model of the learning of text editing knowledge. Proceedings of CHI 1985 Conference on Human Factors in Computing.San Francisco: ACM
5.
PolsonP.G.MuncherE.EngelbeckG. (1986). A test of the common elements theory of transfer. Proceedings of CHI 1986 Conference on Human Factors in Computing.Boston: ACM
6.
ZieglerJ.E.HoppeH.U.FahnrichK.P. (1986). Learning and transfer for text editing with a direct manipulation interface. Proceedings of CHI 1986 Conference on Human Factors in Computing.Boston: ACM.
