Physical learning environments for computers require special consideration and design. The better this “electronic classroom” environment is designed, the greater are the chances that the desired learning will occur. The design/selection of acoustical, lighting, HVAC factors and space/furniture affect each individual. Physical environments effects student learning, physiology and affect. Behavioral science data regarding color, form, acoustics, light intensity, light contrast, and temperature is useful when designing spaces for learning via computer. In this paper we will examine many of the environmental factors which facilitate or inhibit student progress.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BroadbentD. (1976). Noise and the Details of Experiments: A Reply to Poulton. Applied Ergonomics, 7, 231–235.
2.
ChanT. C. (1980). Physical Environ-ment and Middle Grade Achievement. Greenville, SC: Greenville County School District.
3.
CohenE.CohenA. (1983). Planning the Electronic Office, McGraw Hill Book Co.New York.
4.
General Electric. (1986). GE Lighting Level Guide, #205–51333. Cleveland, OH: General Electric.
5.
HarnerD. P. (1973). A Review of Research Concerning the Thermal Environment and its Effects on Learning. Dissertation, University of Mississippi.
6.
HeinesF. M. (1983). Screen Design Strategies for Computer-Assisted Instruction.Maynard, Mass.: Digital Equipment Corporation.
7.
Human Factors of Workstations with Visual Displays. (1984). (3rd. ed.). Armonk, N.Y.: International Business Machines Corporation.
8.
HirschR. S. (June 1984). VDTs and the human factors community: Tipping the Iceberg, Human Factors Society Bulletin, 276, 1–3.
KolersP.A.DuchnickyR. L.FergusonD.C. (1981). “Eye Movement Measurement of Readability of CRT Displays”. Human Factors, 23, 517–527.
11.
LarsonC. T. (1966). The Effect of Windowless Classrooms on Elementary Children.Ann Arbor, MI: Architectural Research Laboratory, Univ. of Mich.
12.
LuC. (1983). Will there ever be an efficient keyboard?High Technology, 3(1), 22–23.
13.
McCormickE. J. (1970). Human Factors Engineering (Third Edition). N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
14.
McCormickE. J. (1976). Human Factors in Engineering and Design (Fourth Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
15.
McCormickE. J.SandersM. S. (1982). Human Factors in Engineering and Design (Fifth Edition) N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
16.
MuterP.LatremouilleS.TreurnietA.BeamP. (October October 1982). Extended Reading of Continuous Text on Television Screens. Human Factors. 24(5), 501–508.
17.
NormanD. A.FisherD.Why Alphabetic Keyboards Are Not Easy to Use: Keyboard Layout Doesn't Much Matter. Human Factors. 24(5), 509–519.
18.
PhillipsM. M. (1965). The Psychological Effects of Color on the Attention Span and Reading Ability of the Hyperactive Child. Master's degree project, University of Southern California.
19.
PoultonE. (1978). A New Look at the Effects of Noise: A Rejoinder. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1068–1079.
20.
PulgramW.L.StonisR.E. (1984). Designing the Automated Office: A Guide for Architects, Interior Designers, Space Planners and Facility Managers, Watson-Guptill, New York.
21.
RudinM. (October 1982). The Ergonomics of Computer Terminals. Computer Products. 64.
22.
SalameP.WittersheimG. (1978). Selective Noise Disturbance of the Information Input in Short-Term Memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 30(4), 693–704.
23.
SinofskyE. R.KnirkF. G. (1981) Color; It can make a difference. Instructional Innovator26, 3, 17–19.
24.
SalmonG. (1979). The Working Office.London: Design Council Publication.
25.
TarterJ. (1983). Ergonomics: A primer, Business Computer Systems, 55–72.
26.
TurnerJ. A.HellerR. S.Selecting the Proper Computer Work Station. Today. 27.
