A dynamic decision-making task was designed for microcomputer that allowed subjects to operate in either a manual mode, or an automatic mode. Nine subjects performed in a repeated measures design that presented identical errors for detection in the two modes. Results showed that sensitivity was higher in the automatic mode; the manual mode elicited a conservative response bias. NASA bipolar rating scales presented a clear picture of higher workload in the manual mode.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CraigA. (1979). Nonparametric measures of sensory efficiency for sustained monitoring tasks. Human Factors, 21, 69–77.
2.
FuldR. B.LiuY.WickensC. D. (1987). Computer monitoring vs. self monitoring: The impact of automation on error detection. Tech. Rep. ARL-87–3/NASA-87–4. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
3.
LiuY.WickensC. D. (1987). Mental workload and cognitive task automation: An evaluation of subjective and time estimation metrics. Tech. Rep. EPL-87–2/NASA-87–2. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
4.
NormanD. A. (1983). Design rules based on analysis of human error. Communications of the ACM, 26, 254–258.
5.
ReasonJ. (1985). Recurrent errors in process environments: Some implications for the design of intelligent decision support systems. In HollnagelE.ManciniG.WoodsD.D. (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments.New York: Springer-Verlag.
6.
SorkinR. D.WoodsD. D. (1985). Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 49–75.
7.
VidulichM. A.TsangP. S. (1985). Assessing subjective workload assessment: A comparison of SWAT and the NASA-Bipolar methods. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
8.
WickensC. D.KesselC. (1981). Failure detection in dynamic systems. In RasmussenJ.RouseW.B. (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures.New York: Plenum Press.
