Both the research data base and practical experience, indicate that engineers involved in the design and development of team training devices either have inadequate access to, or for other reasons do not typically use, human factors and instructional design principles. This paper discusses a project whose purpose is to: (1) identify team processes and characteristics which may be employed in the design of team training devices, (2) state this information in guideline form, and (3) begin the development of a taxonomy of team training design characteristics which may be used to organize the guidelines.
CriswellE.SwezeyR.W.AllenJ.HaysR. (1984). Human Factors Analysis of Two Prototype Army Maintenance Training and Evaluation Simulation System (AMTESS) Devices. Army Research Institute Technical Report No. 652, Alexandria, VA.U.S. Army Research Institute.
3.
DensonR.W. (1981). Team training: literature review and annotated bibliography. AFHRL-TR-80–40, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio, US Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
4.
DyerJ. (1984). Team research and team training: A state of the art review. Chapter 8 in MucklerF. (ed.) Human Factors Review.Santa Monica, Calif. Human Factors Society.
5.
FleischmanE.A.QuaintanceM. (1984). Taxonomies of Human Performance, Orlando, Fla. Academic Press.
6.
HamelC.ClarkS. (1986). CAI evaluation checklist: Human factors guidelines for the design of computer-aided instruction. Technical Report NAVTRASYSCEN TR86–002, Orlando, Fla.US Naval Training Systems Center.
7.
LaugheryK.R. (1984). A select review of the recent (1979–1983) behavioral research literature on training simulators.Boulder, Colo.MicroAnalysis and Design.
8.
MeisterD.FarrD. (1966). The utilization of human factors information by designers. Technical Report Nonr-4974–00–1, Canoga Park, Calif. Bunker-Ramo Corporation.
9.
MeisterD.SullivanD. (1967). A further study of the use of human factors information by designers. Technical Report Nonr-4974–00–2, Canoga Park, Calif. Bunker-Ramo Corporation.
10.
MorganB.B.GlickmanA.S.WoodardE.A.BlaiwesA.S.SalasE. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment. NTSC-TR-86–014. Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, Fla.
11.
SalasE. (1986). Examination of the empirical evidence in team performance. SnodeA.F.Dr. (ed.). Independent Research and Independent Exploratory Development (IR/IED) Programs: Annual Report FY86. (NAVTRASYSCEN TR87–004) Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, Fla.
12.
SalasE.MorganB.B.GlickmanA.S. (1987). The evolution and maturation of operational teams to a training environment. LesterS.T.Dr. (chair). Team Development in Operational Team Training System. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, New York City, NY.
13.
SwezeyR.W.StreufertS.MietusJ. (1983). Development of an empirically derived taxonomy of organizational systems. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, (73), 1, 27–42.
14.
SwezeyR.W.PerezR.MirabellaA. (1986). Army maintenance and evaluation simulation system: Simulation training research (SIMTRAIN) project final report. SAIC Report No. 86–02–178. McLean, VA, Science Applications International Corp.
15.
WarrinerC.K. (1980). Organization types: Notes on the “organizational species” concept. University of Kansas working papers in sociology.Lawrence, Kansas, Charles K. Warriner.
