The present research effort involved the development of a descriptive instructional process model of an operational Navy team training system. The model focuses on the team oriented instructional assessments, decisions, strategies, approaches, feedback processes, etc. used by instructors during team training. It served to clarify and enhance the understanding of team training instructional processes, and permitted evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the instructional system. Based on these, several potential interventions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlluisiE. (1977). Lessons from a study of defense training technology, Educational Technology Systems, 5(1), 57–76.
2.
BaumD.ModrickJ.HollingsworthS. (1981). The status of Air Force team training for command and control systems, (Report No. 81SRC14), Honeywell Systems and Research Center, Minneapolis, MN.
3.
CooperM.GlickmanA.JohnsonR.MallamadS.OlsonH.PriceS.WeinerR.YedlinN. (1979). National Evaluation Program Phase 1 Assessment of Correctional Personnel Training Programs, (Contract No. J-LEAA-23–78), Advanced Research Resources Organization, Washington, DC.
4.
DavisL.GaddyC.TurneyJ. (1985). An approach to team skills training of nuclear power plant control room crews, (NUREG/CR-4258GPTR-123022), General Physics Corporation, Columbia, MD.
5.
DensonR. (1981). Team training: Literature review and annotatedbibliography, (AFHRL-TR-80–40), Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Logistics and Technical Training Division, Air Force Human Research Laboratory.
6.
DyerJ. (1984). State-of-the-art review on team training and performance, Fort Benning, GA: Army Research Institute Field Unit.
7.
GoldinS.ThorndykeP. (Eds.), (1980). Improving team performance: Proceedings of the Rand Team Performance Workshop, (R-2606-ONR), Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
8.
HallE.RizzoW. (1975). An assessment of US Navy tacticaltraining, (TAEG Report No. 18), Training Analysis and Evaluation Group.
9.
KribsD.ThurmundP.MarkL., (1977). Computerized collectivetraining for teams, (Report No. ARI-TR-77–A4), Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington, VA.
10.
MonteroR.CampbellW.ZimmerS.GlickmanA. (1987). Changesin team behaviors during operational training, Symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, New York, NY.
11.
MorganB.GlickmanA.WoodardE.BlaiwesA.SalasE. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy training environment. (Report No. NTSC TR-86–014), Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, FL.
12.
NievaV.FleishmanE.ReichA. (1978). Team dimensions: Theiridentity, their measurement and their relationships, (Contract No. DAHC19–78-C-0001), Response Analysis Corporation, Washington, DC.
13.
RizzoW. (1980). Navy team training: Some critical issues. In GoldinS.ThorndikeP. (Eds.), Improving Team Performance: Proceedings of the Rand Team Performance Workshop, Orlando, FL: Technical Information Center, Naval Training Equipment Center.
14.
RosenbergM. (1982). The ABCs of ISD. Training and Development Journal, 21, 44–50.
15.
SalasE.BlaiwesA.ReynoldsR.GlickmanA.MorganB.Jr. (1985). Teamwork from team training: New directions. Proceedings of the 7th Interservice/Industry Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition, 1, 400–406.
16.
ThurmundP. (1980). Development of analysis, design and development techniques for team ISD, (Report No. PR001–80–005), US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, Va.
17.
ThurmundP.KribsH. (1978). Computerized collective training for teams, (Contract No. DANC 19–76-C-0042 15-ARPA order-2887), US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
