Over-the-Ear Industrial Hearing Protectors: An Assessment of Comfort Issues

Abstract

A self-report methodology was developed for evaluating perceived comfort and related wearability issues among non-earplug hearing protection devices. Rating scale and ranking procedures were completed by fifty subjects after wearing four different noise-attenuating earmuffs and two ear canal caps. The methodology reliably distinguished among different earmuff types and earcaps on a variety of comfort-related measures, as determined by non-parametric statistical analyses. In general, over-the-pinna muffs were found to be more comfortable than over-the-ear canal earcaps, and some muff designs were preferable to others. The earmuffs were also ranked as easier to don than earcaps. It is critical that comfort be a prime consideration in hearing protection device design because it greatly influences the amount of time the device will be worn in the workplace.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berger

E. H.

(1982). The performance of hearing protectors in industrial noise environments. EARlog Series. Indianapolis: Cabot Corporation.

Casali

J. G.

(1986). In defense of industrial workers' hearing. IE Ergonomics Newsletter, 20 (4), Spring 1986. Norcross, GA: Institute of Industrial Engineers.

Casali

J. G.

Lam

S. T.

(1986). Effects of user instructions on earmuff/earcap sound attenuation. Sound and Vibration, 20 (5), 22–28.

Casali

J. G.

Lam

S. T.

Epps

B. W.

Influence of insertion/donning instruction on frequency-specific sound attenuation achieved with earplugs, ear canal caps, and earmuffs with implications for industrial noise application. Blacksburg, VA: VPI&SU, IEOR Dept., Report 8506, August, 1985.

Damongeot

Tisserand

Krawsky

Grosdemange

J. P.

Lievin

(1981). Evaluation of the comfort of personal hearing protectors. In Alberti

P.W.

(Ed.), Personal hearing protection in industry (pp. 151–161). New York: Raven Press.

Epps

B. W.

Casali

J. G.

Hearing protection device comfort and user preference: An investigation and evaluation methodology. Proceedings of the 1985 Human Factors Society 29th Annual Conference, 814–818.

Flugrath

J. M.

Turberville

J. B.

(1972). The effectiveness of earplugs. Sound and Vibration, 6, 32–33.

Lam

S. T.

(1985). Influence of insertion/donning instruction on frequency-specific sound attenuation achieved with ear canal caps and earmuffs with implication for industrial noise application. Master's Thesis, IEOR Dept., VPI&SU, Blacksburg, VA.

Michael

P. L.

(1965). Ear protectors. Arch. Environmental Health, 10, 612–618.

10.

Miller

(1978). Hearing protection; the state of the art. National Safety News, 3, 91–94.

11.

Osgood

C. E.

Suci

G. J.

Tannenbaum

P. H.

(1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

12.

Royster

L. H.

Holder

S. R.

(1981). Personal hearing protection: Problems associated with the hearing protection phase of the hearing conservation program. In Alberti

P. W.

(Ed.), Personal hearing protection in industry (pp. 447–470). New York: Raven Press.

13.

Savich

(1981). Practical problems of hearing protector use in Canadian mines. In Alberti

P.W.

(Ed.), Personal hearing protection in industry (pp. 403–425). New York, Raven Press.

14.

Zwislocki

(1957). Ear protectors. In Harris

C. M.

(Ed.), Handbook of noise control. New York: McGraw-Hill.