Abstract
A self-report methodology was developed for evaluating perceived comfort and related wearability issues among non-earplug hearing protection devices. Rating scale and ranking procedures were completed by fifty subjects after wearing four different noise-attenuating earmuffs and two ear canal caps. The methodology reliably distinguished among different earmuff types and earcaps on a variety of comfort-related measures, as determined by non-parametric statistical analyses. In general, over-the-pinna muffs were found to be more comfortable than over-the-ear canal earcaps, and some muff designs were preferable to others. The earmuffs were also ranked as easier to don than earcaps. It is critical that comfort be a prime consideration in hearing protection device design because it greatly influences the amount of time the device will be worn in the workplace.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
